AUTOMATED LITHOLOGY PREDICTION BASED ON WELL LOGGING DATA USING MACHINE LEARNING
Understanding of the reservoir characteristics and conditions is important in the development of an oil and gas project. One characteristic that needs to be known is the lithology types of the reservoir formation. Information about the lithology types affect the calculation of petrophysical parame...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/40048 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Understanding of the reservoir characteristics and conditions is important in the development of an oil and gas
project. One characteristic that needs to be known is the lithology types of the reservoir formation. Information
about the lithology types affect the calculation of petrophysical parameter of the reservoir. Generally,
identification of lithology types is done manually by geologists based on cuttings sightings, core samples, and
well logging data, which may not be efficient enough as it takes lot of time and effort. Therefore, several
approaches in supervised learning method are applied to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the
identification of lithology types.
In this study the supervised learning method was used so that input data and desired output data were needed to
build a predictive model that would be used to identify the lithology types. Input data used are well logging data
which usually available such as gamma ray (GR), spontaneous potential (SP), density, and neutron porosity.
While the desired output data is obtained from core samples in the form of lithology types label. Several
approaches in supervised learning method were applied to find model with sufficient accuracy, there are KNearest
Neighbors (KNN) model, Support Vector Classifier (SVC) model, NuSVC model, LinearSVC model,
and Stochastic Gradient Descent Classifier (SGDC) model. Data set was divided into train data set and test data
set. 75% of the data is used to train the model while 25% of the data is used as test data. Several adjusting to
parameters of each model was done.
Prediction results of each model is compared. All models are able to achieve accuracy higher than 80%, where
accuracy of these models is 94.09%, 93.18%, 80.91%, 84.09%, and 84.55% for KNN, SVC, NuSVC,
LinearSVC, and SGDC model sequentially. Performances in predicting each label is also compared. KNN and
SVC model offer good overall performances. The study shows that the KNN model is the best model in
predicting lithology types. KNN model can be applied to predicting lithology with improved efficiency and
accuracy. |
---|