PROBABILISTICS OF PLANE FAILURE USING MONTE CARLO SIMULATION IN SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS WITH LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM METHOD IN OPEN MINE PT XYZ
The stability of a slope in mining activity is strongly influenced by geology, especially the rock properties and geological structures. Slope stability analysis will be faced with several problems on the uncertainty of rock properties and rock mass. Slope stability analysis are simply using conc...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/40257 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The stability of a slope in mining activity is strongly influenced by geology, especially the
rock properties and geological structures. Slope stability analysis will be faced with several
problems on the uncertainty of rock properties and rock mass. Slope stability analysis are
simply using concept the value of Safety Factor (SF), using a single value on each input
parameter while the probabilistic methods offer a more systematic way in treating conditions
of uncertainty and provide an alternative to the approach the value of the safety factor that
is information the Probability of Failure (PF) a slope.
The purposes of this study are to determine the value of deterministic safety factors on the
slopes of PT XYZ open pit, determine the probability of plane failure from a Monte Carlo
simulation on the slopes of PT XYZ open pit, determine the optimum safety factor value
from the acceptable probability of failure. There are three locations that have the potential
to occur plane failure, namely location 11, location 43 and location 61. SF deterministic
with limit equilibrium Hoek and Bray method produces a value of 2,134 at location 11, 0.771
at location 43 and 1,912 at location 61. While the value of SF deterministic with limit
equilibrium Janbu method produces value of 0.974 at location 11, 0.529 at location 43 and
1,188 at location 61. PF obtained from the safety factor calculation with limit equilibrium
of Hoek and Bray using Microsoft Excel software is 0% at location 11, 69.25% at location
43 and 0.02% at location 61. PF obtained from the safety factor calculation with limit
equilibrium of Janbu using Slide 6.0 software is 57.36% at location 11, 99.8% at location
43 and 8.6% at location 61. Location 11 needs to be changed the slope angle to 45o
so that
the optimum SF value that can be received is 1.149 with PF 5.25%. Then at location 43, it
is also necessary to change the slope angle to 43o
so that the optimum SF value that can be
received is 2.209 with PF 4.97%. Location 61 already has acceptable PF criteria. |
---|