NETWORK GOVERNANCE WITHIN THE STRATEGIC PLANNING FRAMEWORK TO IMPLEMENT TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) CASE STUDY : MRT JAKARTA PHASE 1

• Main Author: Prima Yesuari, Ayu
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Subjects: Angkutan kereta api
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/40672
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is considered to be one of the tools to solving urban transport problems, where TOD is a mixed use concept and integrated with public transport network. The concept of TOD began to emerge in Indonesia in line with the increasing number of urban mass transit plans, such as the MRT and LRT, or regional mass public transport systems, such as the high speed rail. Many cities in the world are already implementing the concept of TOD, however not always are TOD’s goals fulfilled. During planning and implementation of TOD, emerging governance issues may pop up due to unclear division of authority as well as tensions across sectors and various actors involved with different perceptions, objectives, resources, and strategies. In the Indonesian context, the legal base of planning in implementing TOD is not complete yet. Theoretically, network governance can occur both hierarchically and informally to make effective development and policy implementation. With this background, this study aims to analyze the network governance between actors within the strategic planning framework to implement TOD in Indonesia. The case studies are the development of TOD along the MRT Jakarta Phase 1 corridor, especially the Dukuh Atas TOD. The study applies qualitative approach based on indepth interviews with various actors directly involved in the implementation of TOD. The analytic methods include content analysis and network governance analysis. Initially, policy identification was undertaken in 4 (four) strategic planning frameworks to implement TOD, and then analyzed network governance among actors within each strategic planning framework. From the research results can be concluded that the network governance between actors in implementing this TOD has started to form, but still low. Generally the actors already have an awareness of the existence of multi actors involved with plurakity of perceptions, objectives, and authority, but coordination between actors is still lacking and there is no agreement in achieving common goals because there is no mechanism and guidance of cooperation, besides that there are also deficiencies in institutions and rules that encourage cooperation between actors.