SUBSURFACE MODELING OF SINABUNG VOLCANO AREA BASED ON GRAVITY DATA ANALYSIS
Indonesia is a country that has many volcanoes because of its geological location at the confluence of three tectonic plates, Indo-Australian, Eurasian, and Pacific plate. Interaction between the three plates take part in volcanic formation in Indonesia, one of them is Sinabung volcano. Sinabung...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42090 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia is a country that has many volcanoes because of its geological location at the
confluence of three tectonic plates, Indo-Australian, Eurasian, and Pacific plate. Interaction
between the three plates take part in volcanic formation in Indonesia, one of them is Sinabung
volcano. Sinabung volcano is located in Karo, North Sumatra with an altitude of 2.460 meters
above sea level. Since 1600, Sinabung has not shown volcanic activities so it was classified as a
type B volcano. However, in 2010, Sinabung erupted with a large eruption and still shows
volcanic activities until now. So, this study was conducted to determine the subsurface structure
of Sinabung Volcano in hope that can be used as material for further research in geological
hazard mitigation.
In this study, 2,5 dimensional modeling was done by using gravity method. Gravity method is a
geophysical method based on measurements of gravitational field variations on the surface. The
data used in this study was a complete Bouguer anomaly map that digitized with Surfer to
produce a digital complete Bouguer anomaly map. After that, regional and residual anomalies
were separated by moving average method. For modeling, ModelVision 13.0 was used with
residual anomalies and topograph as input data. Based on the reference, background density
was 2,67 g/cc. The model was made by estimating subsurface geological conditions in the study
area using geological, geophysical, and other literature information. The depth of magma
chamber could not be modeled with residual anomalies as input data. Because, based on
spectral analysis, estimated average depth of residual anomalies was shallow about 3.000 meter |
---|