âFOOD GUERILLAâ COMMUNITY-BASED FOOD HUB IN KIARACONDONG, BANDUNG
The Community-based Food Hub project in Bandung is a fictitious project. This project accommodates the functions of the production, processing, distribution, consumption and education of the food system by involving the communities in response to the issue of threatened food security in the city,...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42521 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The Community-based Food Hub project in Bandung is a fictitious project. This project
accommodates the functions of the production, processing, distribution, consumption and education
of the food system by involving the communities in response to the issue of threatened food security
in the city, human segregation with the food system, and many bottom-up food initiative movements
that have not yet been contained. The initiator of this project is the Office of Agriculture and Food
Security of the City of Bandung in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO) and the community food initiative. The project land is owned by PT KAI, located
on Jalan Ibrahim Adjie, Bandung, with an area of 13,420 square meters.
The basic concept used in this Food Hub design is "Food Guerilla". These two words refer to
different meanings: Food on things related to systems, cycles, and processes. Whereas guerilla is
related to user intervention. The two words indicate that in the design, these two approaches are
needed to be applied in the form of landscape, building mass, space, circulation, and the relationship
between inner space and outer space by taking into account user aspects, functions and sites. The
issues that will be answered by this concept are interactions between users that is related to sense of
place, so that users have a sense of belonging to the place, circulation of visitor and non-visitor users
who have different needs, and responses to the area relating to building relationships with the area
and reflecting the function of the image of the building. |
---|