IDENTIFIKASI DAN ANALISIS KUALITATIF RISIKO TERHADAP KETERLAMBATAN PROYEK DARI PENGGUNAAN GIRDER BETON PRACETAK PADA JALAN LAYANG DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS: PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN 6 RUAS JALAN TOL DALAM KOTA JAKARTA TAHAP 1 SEKSI A KELAPA GADING – PULO GEBANG)

• Main Author: Pratama, Aditya
• Format: Final Project
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42828
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

The use of Precast Concrete in Indonesia is Increasing due to the large benefits offered. One type of Precast Concrete that is often used is Girder Type Precast Concrete, which is used in the construction of Bridges and Overpass in Indonesia. The use of the latest Technology in Construction involing Precast Concrete poses a Variety of risks that can cause problems such as delays and costs. Risk Management is needed to identifty and anticipate risks that arise. A Case study was conducted on the Phase 1 Section of Jakarta Toll Road Development Project Section A Kelapa Gading – Pulo Gebang, A Flyover Construction Project using Box-Girder type precast girder. Risk identification will be carried out as well as qualitative analysis to determine the priorit of risks that arise in the implementation involving girders. The two main jobs that are reviewed are jobs that have a relatively high level of risk compared to other jobs, namely the work of Girder Stressing and Girder Erection. Risk identification is done by conducting a study based on previous documents and by conducting interviews with experts. Fifty Girder Stressing risks and sixty-five Girder Erection risks are identified. After the risks have been identified, a risk priority is determined by distributing questionnaires to the workers involved in the project being reviewed. Risks with the highest risk value overall will be carried out a risk response process by conducting interviews with experts regarding corrective and preventive solutions. The highest risk of delay in Girder Stressing activities is the delay of the planner or management consultant in approving the Working Drawings, with the highest risk group being in the Resources Group or Resources used in implementing Girder Stressing (such as labor and materials). The highest risk of delay in Girder Erection activities is the risk associated with the limited erection time available every day, with the highest risk group being in the Erection-related Project Conditions group.