INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT A CASE STUDY: INDONESIA PORT CORPORATION
The purpose of this research is to conduct a feasibility study related to the development of grain terminal at one of sea ports owned by Indonesia Port Corporation. This study aims to determine the most appropriate investment strategy both in normal market trend and within condition when there is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42863 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The purpose of this research is to conduct a feasibility study related to the development of grain terminal
at one of sea ports owned by Indonesia Port Corporation. This study aims to determine the most
appropriate investment strategy both in normal market trend and within condition when there is a trend
breaker. The study will answer the question of what alternative strategies are available to carry out
development plan. Which is the best investment strategy based on Net Present Value (NPV), Internal
Rate of Return (IRR), Pay Back Period (PBP) and Value at Risk under normal market trend? Which is
the best investment strategy based on NPV within condition when there is a trend breaker? Exploration
begins with an analysis of the business situation using PESTLE analysis, competitor analysis, port
capacity analysis and financial performance analysis. The SWOT & TOWS framework is then used to
formulate solution scenarios, namely; (1) "as is" terminal operation, (2) single stage terminal
development, (3) multi stages terminal development. In normal market trend, each scenario is then
evaluated through Capital Budgeting analysis using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method while
Value at Risk (VaR) is evaluated using Monte Carlo Simulation. In the presence of trend breaker,
Decision Tree analysis is used to evaluate the Net Present Value of each scenario. This evaluation
concludes that the multi-stage development strategy produces the best value of investment criteria
under normal market trends and when there is a trend breaker. |
---|