FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wibisono, Marco
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42916
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:42916
spelling id-itb.:429162019-09-24T14:23:20ZFINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS Wibisono, Marco Manajemen umum Indonesia Theses Bias, Decision Review, Final Investment Decision, Major Capital Projects, Oil & Gas. INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42916 Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rational process is required to minimize uncertainties and provide all the required information for a decision maker to make a high-quality, measured decision in continuing with execution of the project. Semi-structured interview for projects with CAPEX valued around $500 million, and above $10 billion were performed; coupled with comparison between appropriation and actual results, and literature reviews to uncover the complexities, experienced issues that happened in the process. Process and bias analysis were performed to provide solution. Reviews were made on Decision Executive (DE)/Decision Review Board (DRB) effectiveness, market price intelligence, high-grading or project sequencing options, external alignment, optimum time period of investment, biases encountered and how to mitigate them. To mitigate above identified issues, inclusion of mitigation in the FID process, through DE/DRB alignment, project sequencing, market condition scenarios, technology maturity review, debiasing methods, external stakeholder engagement, and optimize time to FID, including transformation and implementation process is presented as part of the study’s conclusion. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Manajemen umum
spellingShingle Manajemen umum
Wibisono, Marco
FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
description Uncertainties from many factors, oil price, production, execution and operational risks, external factors, are issues that impact project profitability. For major capital projects (MCPs), with magnitude of investment well into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, a robust, structured rational process is required to minimize uncertainties and provide all the required information for a decision maker to make a high-quality, measured decision in continuing with execution of the project. Semi-structured interview for projects with CAPEX valued around $500 million, and above $10 billion were performed; coupled with comparison between appropriation and actual results, and literature reviews to uncover the complexities, experienced issues that happened in the process. Process and bias analysis were performed to provide solution. Reviews were made on Decision Executive (DE)/Decision Review Board (DRB) effectiveness, market price intelligence, high-grading or project sequencing options, external alignment, optimum time period of investment, biases encountered and how to mitigate them. To mitigate above identified issues, inclusion of mitigation in the FID process, through DE/DRB alignment, project sequencing, market condition scenarios, technology maturity review, debiasing methods, external stakeholder engagement, and optimize time to FID, including transformation and implementation process is presented as part of the study’s conclusion.
format Theses
author Wibisono, Marco
author_facet Wibisono, Marco
author_sort Wibisono, Marco
title FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
title_short FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
title_full FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
title_fullStr FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
title_full_unstemmed FINAL INVESTMENT DECISION (FID) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN OIL & GAS MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT CASE STUDY OF PT. VUL’S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
title_sort final investment decision (fid) process improvement in oil & gas major capital project case study of pt. vul’s decision-making process
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/42916
_version_ 1822926418869223424