ANALYSING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE KIRSCH EQUATION IN CALCULATION OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION AROUND THE SHALLOW TUNNEL
Underground construction can be conducted in the form of civil and mining tunnels. Before the construction of tunnel, induced stresses distribution analysis surrounding the tunnel must be calculated. The aim is to find out the stresses distribution condition of rock mass if it’s disturbed and the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/43487 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Underground construction can be conducted in the form of civil and mining tunnels. Before
the construction of tunnel, induced stresses distribution analysis surrounding the tunnel must
be calculated. The aim is to find out the stresses distribution condition of rock mass if it’s
disturbed and the tunnel has formed so that the excavation is safe and controlled. The
calculation of induced stresses distribution can be carried out by using analytical and numerical
methods.
In this research, induced stresses calculations were conducted for shallow tunnel. The shallow
tunnel was located in the depth of less than twenty times the radius of the tunnel. The induced
stresses analysed were tangential and radial stresses in the sidewall and roof of the tunnel. The
results of calculations using analytical methods are compared with numerical methods and then
the results are analysed to produce the most suitable method used in shallow tunnels.
Analytical methods and numerical methods have different calculation principles, with these
differences there will be the possibility of differences in the results of calculations. It was
revealed that the average differences between analytical and numerical methods are
significantly high in the tunnel roof and very small in the tunnel sidewall. In the roof the
differences are 57.41% for radial stress and 45.12% for tangential stress. In the sidewall the
differences are 2.75% for radial stress and 1.41% for tangential stress. |
---|