FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE
The ability of P-S converted-wave to image the complex geology structure is more reliable than the P-P. In the same P-wave frequency bandwidth, S-wave has the shorter wavelength, therefore the vertical resolution of the S-wave is higher than the P-wave. Using multicomponent receiver, the seismic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44006 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:44006 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:440062019-10-01T11:11:19ZFULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE Ratri Wibowo, Adisti Indonesia Final Project full waveform modelling, converted-wave, resolution, thin-bed, frequency, fresnel zone, configuration. INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44006 The ability of P-S converted-wave to image the complex geology structure is more reliable than the P-P. In the same P-wave frequency bandwidth, S-wave has the shorter wavelength, therefore the vertical resolution of the S-wave is higher than the P-wave. Using multicomponent receiver, the seismic signals are recorded on the vertical and horizontal components. Both of P-P and P-S wave are recorded on these components, however due to their displacement vector the P-P data would be dominated on the vertical component while on the horizontal component is dominated by the P-S data. The aim for this study is to compare the behavior of the P-P and P-S for the subsurface imaging especially for the existence of a thin-bed. To achieve the purpose of this study, a synthetic model of a thin-bed underneath gas layer was generated by the full waveform modelling. The P-P and P-S seismic data processing are performed to obtain the seismic sections. Processing is also carried out by extracting P-S wave from vertical component. Stack section does not indicate any seismic event, that frequency and fresnel zone analysis of both P-P and P-S waves are performed. The result of this study presents the resolution of P-S is way more reliable than the P-P quality. However, extracting P-S wave from vertical component is more difficult as lower dominant frequency and higher gamma function. This depends on configuration and parameters of the seismic acquisition geometry. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
description |
The ability of P-S converted-wave to image the complex geology structure is more
reliable than the P-P. In the same P-wave frequency bandwidth, S-wave has the
shorter wavelength, therefore the vertical resolution of the S-wave is higher than
the P-wave. Using multicomponent receiver, the seismic signals are recorded on
the vertical and horizontal components. Both of P-P and P-S wave are recorded on
these components, however due to their displacement vector the P-P data would be
dominated on the vertical component while on the horizontal component is
dominated by the P-S data. The aim for this study is to compare the behavior of the
P-P and P-S for the subsurface imaging especially for the existence of a thin-bed.
To achieve the purpose of this study, a synthetic model of a thin-bed underneath
gas layer was generated by the full waveform modelling. The P-P and P-S seismic
data processing are performed to obtain the seismic sections. Processing is also
carried out by extracting P-S wave from vertical component. Stack section does not
indicate any seismic event, that frequency and fresnel zone analysis of both P-P and
P-S waves are performed. The result of this study presents the resolution of P-S is
way more reliable than the P-P quality. However, extracting P-S wave from vertical
component is more difficult as lower dominant frequency and higher gamma
function. This depends on configuration and parameters of the seismic acquisition
geometry. |
format |
Final Project |
author |
Ratri Wibowo, Adisti |
spellingShingle |
Ratri Wibowo, Adisti FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
author_facet |
Ratri Wibowo, Adisti |
author_sort |
Ratri Wibowo, Adisti |
title |
FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
title_short |
FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
title_full |
FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
title_fullStr |
FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
title_full_unstemmed |
FULL WAVEFORM MODELLING FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVERTED-WAVE SEISMIC REFLECTION: COMPARISON OF P-P AND P-S FOR A THINBED SUBSURFACE |
title_sort |
full waveform modelling for subsurface characterization with converted-wave seismic reflection: comparison of p-p and p-s for a thinbed subsurface |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44006 |
_version_ |
1821999039208488960 |