COMPARISON OF COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM CAPACITY IN NETWORKING (Lebakmuncang Village and Cinunuk Village, Bandung District)
Networking is an aspect of community capacity that has an important role in community-based tourism development. In developing tourism villages, the behavior of the community to build and maintain networks is important to be discussed before the development phase of tourism goes further. The purp...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44147 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Networking is an aspect of community capacity that has an important role in
community-based tourism development. In developing tourism villages, the
behavior of the community to build and maintain networks is important to be
discussed before the development phase of tourism goes further. The purpose of
this research is to study the capacity of community-based tourism communities
related to networking efforts in Desa Lebakmuncang and Desa Cinunuk. This
research uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Primary data obtained from
interviews with several key informants involved as members of the tourism
community. While the secondary data used included a collection of literature
studies, agency data, reports from village tourism community organizations, and
some news from the media. The method for analyzing results uses content
analysis. The results of the study are in the form of a comparison of the
characteristics of community capacity between the agro-education based
Lebakmuncang Village and the Cinunuk Village based on cultural tourism on
networking. From the results of identifying the role of community-based tourism
communities in building networks, these two villages already have roles that have
network values and are relevant to the community, namely their role as mentors,
negotiators, and mediators. However, these roles are not yet optimal, because the
networks they have are not yet effective and efficient in terms of collaboration,
collective action, and collaboration with other actors. While the identification of
the factors that make the community do networking is known that the sharing
benefit factor is the most influential factor (driving factor) in the communities in
both villages in doing networking. So in general, the community will network if
there are financial and / or non-financial benefits (in the form of facilities,
infrastructure, etc.). Some recommendations to increase community capacity were
included as a solutive effort to become a capable and sustainable organization. |
---|