SEMIVARIOGRAM ISOTROPIC ROBUST AND NONROBUST ANALYSIS IN BANDUNGâS THEFT DATA
In this study loss value caused by theft in Bandung will modeled by semivariogram isotropic robust and non robust. Semivariogram can represent spatial correlation between the theft locations by variance of difference loss of pair locations. The data have two big loss value that called outliers. T...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/44303 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | In this study loss value caused by theft in Bandung will modeled by
semivariogram isotropic robust and non robust. Semivariogram can represent
spatial correlation between the theft locations by variance of difference loss of
pair locations. The data have two big loss value that called outliers. Therefore, in
this study used two approach robust semivariogram that are Cressie-Hawkins and
Dowd also non robust that is Matheron. Determination of the best model in
semivariogram can be done by determine the right parameters model nugget effect
(????0), sill (????), and range (????). In this study ???? will determined based on variance of
loss value and statistic of experimental semivariogram (?????(?)) that are mean
(??????(?)), first quartile (????1(?????(?))), median(????2(?????(?))), and third
quartile(????3(?????(?))). Through determination the ???? will estimated ???? by numeric
method. The result shows that from three semivariogram approachs the right
model for this data is Gauss with ???? around 2 kilometers. It said that the case of
theft which happened in radius 2 kilometers has similar loss value. Data that has
big loss or outliers has candidate of sill is median of experimental semivariogram.
However, data that loss value is similar or homogeneous has candidate of sill are
variance of loss and third quartile of experimental semivariogram. Furthermore, in
this studies obtained value of ???? = 2. It indicates that the case of theft that
happened in radius 2 kilometers has similar loss value. Furthermore, the result
also said that ???? of outlier is (????2(?????(?))). Nevertheless, data that has low
variability of loss can choose ???? are variance of loss and (????3(?????(?))). Furthermore,
after has the best model the next step is kriging as validation. The kriging is adapt
the process of Jackknife that is removed one location then estimate the loss value
at that lovation. Repeat the step until all locations has estimate value. The last is
calculate Sum Square Error (SSE) of the real and estimated loss value. |
---|