PROPOSED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT USING SIX SIGMA AND DAVID GARVIN APPROACH (CASE STUDY: PT. PLN (PERSERO) ELECTRICITY MAINTENANCE CENTER)
PT. PLN (Persero) is obliged to provide electricity continuously, in sufficient quantities with good quality and reliability. One parent unit of PT. PLN (Persero), namely PT. PLN (Persero) Electricity Maintenance Center (Pusharlis) engaged in services, production, maintenance and repair of electri...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/45571 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PT. PLN (Persero) is obliged to provide electricity continuously, in sufficient quantities with good
quality and reliability. One parent unit of PT. PLN (Persero), namely PT. PLN (Persero) Electricity
Maintenance Center (Pusharlis) engaged in services, production, maintenance and repair of electrical
equipment. One of the production processes carried out is the manufacture of Air Preheater (APH)
products. Unfortunately, conditions that occur in production process is incompatible with the plan and
a delay in the production process with difference of 37 days longer. This will result in the customer
not being able to reach the energy availability target and will disrupt the maintenance cycle at other
plants.
The objective of this research is to identify the root problems and proposed solutions that can improve
the quality. This research analyzes the production process of production only from Air Preheater
products. The defect data taken is the data in 2019 on the making of Air Preheater Pelabuhan Ratu.
Identification and analysis of root problems using the Current Reality Tree method. There are 3
problems that have occurred during the Air Preheater production process, Factory Acceptance Testing
(FAT) prototype; dimension, number of sheets, weight; cutting process. The proposed solution using
Six-Sigma and David Garvin approach. Total defect is 73 with Defects-Per-Million-Opportunities
(DPMO) 1,436.611. Analyze step using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) with highest Risk
Priority Number (RPN) 280 for cutting process, followed by dimension, number of sheets, weight with
RPN 240, and 168 for FAT prototype. David Garvin approach is analyzed from product quality, and
the most important concern is the weight and balance of the APH. This relates to the elements in the
APH product itself.
Proposed solution from the root cause that has been previously analyzed are initial design checking,
delivery of methods and division of tasks at the beginning before the process is carried out, human
resources management, monitoring and inspection periodically, improve communication and
coordination process, selection of service vendors that meet the qualifications, new machine
replacement, machine maintenance and documentation periodically. From the 7 proposed solutions,
can be summarized into 3 aspects which are concerns, people, monitoring / process and machine.
Control plan for those improvements are develop a scheduling of the production process and the
Person in Charge (PIC) that is responsible for each process, develop documentation or checklist for
each production process, daily evaluation (discussion) that refers to the checklist. This research also
proposed checklist and project schedule for the implementation plan is divided to 3 implementation
stage, socialization, planning and execution with a length of 3 months. |
---|