IN VITRO AND IN SITU ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITIES STUDY OF FINGERROOT RHIZOME (Kaempferia pandurata Roxb.) AGAINST Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of bacterial skin and soft tissue infections in the world. The prevalence of S.aureus skin infection is high in nosocomial infections. Treatment of S.aureus infections increasingly difficult due to the presence of resistant strains, known as Methicil...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/45957 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of bacterial skin and soft tissue
infections in the world. The prevalence of S.aureus skin infection is high in
nosocomial infections. Treatment of S.aureus infections increasingly difficult due
to the presence of resistant strains, known as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA). Previous research reported that ethanolic extract of fingerroot
rhizome has antibacterial activity against S.aureus. This study will evaluate
antibacterial activity of fractions from ethanolic extract of fingerroot rhizome in
vitro against S.aureus and MRSA as well as in situ antibacterial activity against
skin infection caused by S.aureus in rabbits, determine the compound which act as
antibacterial agent in active fraction, and determining antibacterial work site of
active fraction against S.aureus. The crude drug of fingerroot rhizome extracted
by reflux using ethanol 96% as solvent, then was fractionated by liquid-liquid
extraction using n-hexane and ethyl acetate. In vitro antibacterial activity of
ethanolic extract, n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and water fraction was tested by
microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) as well as determination
equivalency of antibacterial activity to standard antibiotic (Tetracycline HCl) with
agar diffusion method against S.aureus and MRSA. Bioautography was done to
the most active fraction to determine antibacterial compounds. Determination of
antibacterial work site of active fraction observed by SEM. In situ antibacterial
activity was performed by giving the ointment and cream of extract, and
oxytetracycline ointment in rabbits that injected by S.aureus. The observed
parameters were diameter of erythema, edema thickness, and diameter of pus.
Primary and ocular irritation test were conducted to assess the safety of topical
preparations. Microdilution test results showed MIC value of ethanolic extract, nhexane, and ethyl acetate fraction against S. aureus were 64, 64, and 512 ppm
respectively, whereas for MRSA were 128, 128, and 1024 ppm respectively. The
MBC of the ethanolic extract, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate fraction against S.
aureus were 256, 64, and 1024 ppm respectively, whereas for MRSA were
8192,128, and 1024 ppm respectively. Bioautography of n-hexane fraction
showed two active antibacterial spots for S.aureus. Observation by SEM exposed
that cell of S.aureus which was given by n-hexane fraction showed morphological
change became not flat and irregular. In situ antibacterial test showed a total score
of 3% oxytetracycline ointment was lower and significantly different (p<0.05)
with positive control on day 4 of treatment, while the total score of 3% extract
cream was lower and significantly different (p<0.05) with positive control on day
6, and significantly different (p<0.05) with 3% oxytetracycline ointment on day
23. Ointment of extract 3% had significantly different (p<0.05) with positive
control on day 25. N-hexane fraction showed the best antibacterial activity among
ethanolic extract, ethyl acetate, and water fractions. Antibacterial activity
equivalency of n-hexane fraction to tetracycline HCl was the highest against
MRSA (1 mg fraction ~ 1.79 x 10
-2
mg tetracycline HCl). There was flavonoid
iv
compound besides panduratin A that have the most powerful role as an
antibacterial agent in n-hexane fraction. Based on SEM result, n-hexane fraction
was supposed to be worked on cell membrane or protein. Cream of extract 3%
gave the best antibacterial activity than 3% oxytetracycline ointment and 3%
extract ointment against skin which was infected by S.aureus. Ointment and
cream of extract 3% did not irritate the skin and eyes of rabbits.
|
---|