INTERPRETASI DATA GRAVITASI DAERAH GUNUNG TANGKUBAN PERAHU DAN SEKITARNYA UNTUK MENENTUKAN POTENSI PANAS BUMI
Indonesia’s energy usage has been increasing steadily in the past few years. There are a lot of energy sources in Indonesia and one of them is geothermal energy. Geothermal energy became our focus in this experiment, because of ineffective use of geothermal energy as a renewable energy. Geophysic...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/49767 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia’s energy usage has been increasing steadily in the past few years. There
are a lot of energy sources in Indonesia and one of them is geothermal energy.
Geothermal energy became our focus in this experiment, because of ineffective use
of geothermal energy as a renewable energy. Geophysics exploration was done, on
Tangkuban Perahu Mountain and its surroundings, to find geothermal sources.
Gravity method, using Newton gravitation principal, was used for the exploration.
Gravity method used gravimeter to measure gravitation around the experiment area.
Gravitation data, from measurement, then is corrected to generate complete bouger
anomaly. Regional and residual separation is done towards complete bouger
anomaly. Then complete bouger anomaly, regional anomaly, and residual anomaly
are made into contour map. Contour maps are interpreted so illustrations about
underground situations are obtained. Complete bouger anomalies are measured
around 270 to 380 mgal. Regional anomalies ranged between 90 to 370 mgal and
residual anomalies ranged between -30 to 270 mgal. Three sets of lanes are made to
be modeled to show if there’s any geothermal reservoir. line AB has relative density,
to the surrounding area, ranges between -0.206 to +0.4524. Relative density in line
CD ranged between +0.4901 to -0.155. For line EF, the relative density varied around
-0.136 and 0.4160. Modeled results, from gravity method, are then compared to
model from Controlled-source Audio-frequency Magnetotellurics (CSAMT)
method. The model between two methods are similar. |
---|