CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND THE ROLE OF LOCAL INSTITUTIONS IN FACILITATING ADAPTIVE CAPACITY â THE CASE OF THE âCLIMATE VILLAGE PROGRAMâ, DKI JAKARTA, INDONESIA
The climate resilience discourse has greatly evolved and begun to see the system as complex and uncertain. As a result, the adaptive capacity is now seen as an important element of long-term adaptation to respond to the complex and uncertain element in climate change. This study analysed whether...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/51336 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The climate resilience discourse has greatly evolved and begun to see the system as
complex and uncertain. As a result, the adaptive capacity is now seen as an
important element of long-term adaptation to respond to the complex and uncertain
element in climate change. This study analysed whether the quality of adaptive
capacity possessed within institutions can allow and encourage the community to
adapt to complex and uncertain climate change impact through CBA practice. This
study chooses DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, as a case study that is now actively engaged
in the national program's so-called climate-village program' (Proklim). This
program highly relies on CBA practice for climate adaptation actions. The
institutions adaptive capacity investigation undertaken in Malakasari and Cempaka
Putih Timur village in DKI Jakarta Province. The institution adaptive capacity is
analysed under two layers at the local level: the local government and the
community. The findings show that the institutions have not achieved a desirable
adaptive capacity state in a way the literature argues. Nevertheless, the existing
quality of adaptive capacity within institutions can improve the CBA practice at the
neighbourhood level. The analysis uncovers that the difficulty lies more heavily in
building adaptive capacity at the community level. The tension between bottom-up
and top-down approaches in Proklim implementation seems to hamper the
community's ability to improvise, respond more flexibly, and made contextappropriate climate adaptation actions. |
---|