COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON PERFORMANCE AND EXHAUST GAS EMISSONS ON GAS TURBINE TYPE 1S/60 ROVER USING BLENDED OF SOAP-DERIVED KEROSENE AND BLENDED OF HYDROPROCESSED ESTERS AND FATTY ACIDS WITH THE RATION OF 0%, 10%, AND 20%

Due to on significant decrease of fuel and gas resources, in contrast to steady increase of national fuel demand such that on the year of 2018 the import of fuel was reaching of Rp.213 Triliun rupiah. As plenty of palm plantation across the country, therefore, the application of biofuels such as b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amiruddin Rasjid, Achmad
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/51376
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
Description
Summary:Due to on significant decrease of fuel and gas resources, in contrast to steady increase of national fuel demand such that on the year of 2018 the import of fuel was reaching of Rp.213 Triliun rupiah. As plenty of palm plantation across the country, therefore, the application of biofuels such as bioavtur is becoming strategic key for national budget. In addition. Application of bioavtur will slowdown to the development of greenhouse effects, in fact that aviation has contributed carbon dioxide around 2%. This research applied two types of bioavtur technology; firstly blending of Jet A-1 and soap-derived biokerosene (SBK), secondly blending of Jet A-1 and hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA), where every type was blended in volume-ratio of 0%, 10%, and 20%. In ITB’s Lab, all of them were applied on a gas-turbine of Rover 1S/60. From testing on Rover 1S/60 by applying blended of 20%, it is described the application of Jet A1 only, and its blending with SBK or HEFA. For engine performances for instant for thermal efficiency and specific fuel consumption, that HEFA bended are superior than the similar parameters applied by SBK blended. Mean while for emission indicators, SBK blended produced more CO than the used of HEFA blende. In addition, SBK blended created more NOX by 3,8% than application of Jet A1 only. Contrary HEFA blended produced lower NOX by 27,6% than application of Jet A1 only. It is concluded, in overall indications that HEFA blended is superior than SBK blened