THE EFFECT OF ABSORBERS FORMATION ON THE SOUND DIFFUSE REFLECTION
The growth of biophilic architectural that emphasizes the comfort, health and productivity of humans requires comfort of visual, air, lighting, and acoustic. This principle affects various building typologies including office design. In achieving a good acoustic condition in the work area, sound...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/52005 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The growth of biophilic architectural that emphasizes the comfort, health and
productivity of humans requires comfort of visual, air, lighting, and acoustic. This
principle affects various building typologies including office design. In achieving a
good acoustic condition in the work area, sound absorbers are the main part in
efforts to control reverberation time. Due to aesthetic and acoustic needs, the
design of sound absorbers varies. These variations in the geometry of absorbers
design have an impact on the absorption performance and sound reflections as a
result of the slopes and air cavities that are formed. In this study, the absorption
and diffusivity of absorbers in a zigzag shape and a combination of materials were
observed, and their effects on the context. The case study in this research is an open
plan office which is a popular office layout nowadays and has requirements of
acoustics treatments.
The material chosen is Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and as a combination
Binary Amplitude Diffsorber (BAD) panels are also used to provide a wider range
of absorption coefficient. There are 4 scenarios tested: PET with flat and zigzag,
and a combination PET and BAD panels with flat and zigzag shapes. The size of
the prototype is 1.2 x 2.4 meters, which consists of 8 modules measuring 0.6 x 0.6
meters. The absorption coefficient of the prototype was tested to validate the
reference and to know the absorption coefficient when the material was zigzagged
and combined. Furthermore, the prototype was tested for diffusivity using CATDDC
software in the anechoic room. Diffusivity testing was carried out using 37
microphones and 5 speakers. From this test, the diffusion coefficients of the 4
prototype scenarios are obtained. After that, a room acoustic simulation is
performed to determine the impact of diffusivity on open plan office model. The
diffusion coefficient from the test is used as a reference for room acoustic
simulation with software CATT-Acoustic v9.
The results of the diffusion test show that the more diffusive reflection is shown by
the zigzag-shaped prototype as a result of the tilted arrangement of the panels
which prevents the sound from reflecting as specular reflection. The configuration
with the combined material also increases diffusivity as a result of the impedance
difference at the surface, so that the resulting a more diffusive reflection. The room acoustic simulation results show that there are differences in the acoustic
conditions produced by the scattering coefficient. The difference can be observed
in the SPL distribution, the zigzag ceiling shape shows a decrease in the level of the
sound distribution at a certain distance compared to the flat shape. The decrease
in SPL is different for each frequency with a difference between 1-3 dB. However,
for other parameters the changes were not significant: changes in the reverberation
time parameter (T30) <0.2 seconds, the distraction distance (rD) <0.5 m, and the
privacy distance (rP) <1 m. |
---|