NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF APPLICATION UNDERGROUND HEAT EXCHANGER AS SIMPLE HOUSE AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM IN BANDUNG
Building air conditioning systems use forty percent of global energy consumption. The use of refrigerants also has an adverse effect on the environment, such as ozone layer depletion and global warming. Underground heat exchanger is one solution to solve this problem. This system utilizes the soi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/52122 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Building air conditioning systems use forty percent of global energy consumption.
The use of refrigerants also has an adverse effect on the environment, such as ozone layer
depletion and global warming. Underground heat exchanger is one solution to solve this
problem. This system utilizes the soil as a heatsink which tends to be at constant temperature
throughout the year. This research is still not widely conducted in Indonesia. Therefore, the
application of an underground heat exchanger in a simple house is studied in this study.
Underground heat exchanger designed for house type 36 in Bandung. This system
model is simulated using a numerical simulation program with the finite volume method. The
temperature profile, heat and the effect of design parameters on system performance were
studied in this study. The results of this study are an optimum underground heat exchanger
design and a comparison of the performance of this system with a split AC system.
Based on the selected design parameters, the underground heat exchanger has a
volume of and a total surface area of contact is . The cooling capacity obtained
is depending on soil conditions. Increasing the pipe diameter and flow
velocity will reduce the average temperature difference by and while
the increase in thickness and soil depth increases the average temperature difference by
and , respectively. The pipe surface distance is recommended to be
greater than . This system has met the SNI comfortable air temperature standards and
ASHRAE ventilation airflow standards but can only meet of the house cooling
load. This system has 75.8% lower energy consumption and higher COP than a
split AC system.
|
---|