A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE AESTHETIC ELEMENTS OF BATIK SAWAT PENGANTIN (CASE STUDY: THE BATIK COLLECTION BY SULTAN ABDUL GANI NATADININGRAT AS THE 9TH SULTAN OF KACIREBONAN AND THE BATIK COLLECTION BY MASINA TRUSMI CIREBON)
Batik is one of the Indonesian cultural heritage. Batik has a long historical trace, that we can find the history of batik even as early as the Majapahit era. Cirebon is one of the regions in Western Java, which preserve the tradition of batik and have batik centers in Trusmi. We concentrate the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/52615 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Batik is one of the Indonesian cultural heritage. Batik has a long historical trace,
that we can find the history of batik even as early as the Majapahit era. Cirebon is
one of the regions in Western Java, which preserve the tradition of batik and have
batik centers in Trusmi. We concentrate the object of this research on batik sawat
pengantin as this design of batik is a popular research object in neither journals
nor literature we have found, particularly that which address aesthetic elements
of batik. Meanwhile, nowadays, batik sawat pengantin is an ever-increasingly
notable garment which is worn not only on marriage occasions but also in
people’s daily lives. However, people seem to lack a thorough apprehension
regarding the aesthetic elements of batik sawat pengantin, and thereby missing
philosophical messages borne by the batik. Accordingly, a study of those aesthetic
elements is crucial. We had selected two collections of batik sawat pengantin to
study, i.e., the batik collection of Sultan Abdul Gani and the batik collection of
Masina.
The research method was qualitative to generate descriptive data. Data were
analyzed using a comparative method and examined to figure out the similarities
and dissimilarities in the researched objects, namely the batik collection of Sultan
Abdul Gani and the batik collection of Masina. Primary data were collected using
structural interviews with several informants. Secondary data were collected from
literature studies and documentation. Findings indicate that the two collectors
maintained different ornament naming stylization. In the batik collection of sultan
Abdul Gani, we find ornaments named damar sewu, kanzul tarraqi, belah ketupat,
guwa garba ma’rifatiman, klambi Ong Tin, lam alif, daun sirih, kembang teratai,
and burung terbang. Moreover, in the batik collection of Masina, the names of the
ornaments were oriented to Sundanese brides’ accessories, e.g., mangle pasung,
pinti, sunda siger, rambang melati, and kembang teratai. We found similar
naming in the sawat and atap rumah ornaments. The two batik collections
retained dissimilarities in isen-isen (fillers) and colors.
|
---|