LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ANALYSIS BASED ON CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT) DATA IN SEPAKU DISTRICT, PENAJAM PASER UTARA REGENCY, KALIMANTAN TIMUR PROVINCE
Endeavors to move the capital city of Indonesia from DKI Jakarta to East Kalimantan have been initiated since 2019, motivated by the low risk of natural disasters in the East Kalimantan region. However, the East Kalimantan region is not completely safe from natural disasters because there are fau...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53131 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Endeavors to move the capital city of Indonesia from DKI Jakarta to East Kalimantan
have been initiated since 2019, motivated by the low risk of natural disasters in the
East Kalimantan region. However, the East Kalimantan region is not completely safe
from natural disasters because there are fault structures that have the potential to
cause natural disasters, one of which is an earthquake that can cause secondary
impacts in the form of liquefaction. The purpose of this study was to analyze the
potential for liquefaction in Sepaku District, Penajam Paser Utara Regency, East
Kalimantan Province. In this study, cone penetration test (CPT) data and seismicity
data were used in the research area. To analyze the potential for liquefaction in the
study area, an empirical method was used which was formulated by Seed and Idriss in
1971 and Robertson and Wride in 1998. Basically, this method compares the variables
that trigger liquefaction and the variable soil resistance to liquefaction. The variable
that triggers liquefaction is represented by the cyclic stress ratio (CSR), while the soil
resistance variable to liquefaction is represented as the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR).
If the CSR value is greater than the CRR value, the measurement point will be
considered to have the potential for liquefaction. Meanwhile, if the CSR value is
smaller than the CRR value, the measurement point will be considered not to have the
potential for liquefaction. The comparison between the CSR and CRR values is
represented as a factor of safety (FS). Then, the liquefaction potential index (LPI) value
is also calculated for analysis. The results of the LPI calculation will be classified
based on the classification made by Iwasaki in 1981 and show that in the study area
there are points that have high and low potential. From the results of the LPI
calculation, a microzonation map of the liquefaction potential in the study area can be
made |
---|