3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD
Reflection seismic data processing aims to produce image of Earth’s subsurface layers. A series of steps and various processing methods are carried out in hopes of increasing signal-to-noise ratio in order to produce the most representative subsurface image. Some important steps in reflection sei...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53214 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:53214 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:532142021-03-02T10:45:45Z3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD Tabina Joebhaar, Diya Indonesia Final Project NMO, DMO, CRS, velocity analysis, velocity semblance, amplitude, stacking, prestack time migration INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53214 Reflection seismic data processing aims to produce image of Earth’s subsurface layers. A series of steps and various processing methods are carried out in hopes of increasing signal-to-noise ratio in order to produce the most representative subsurface image. Some important steps in reflection seismic data processing are stacking and migration. There are three stacking methods that were used in this research, which are Normal Moveout (NMO) and Dip Moveout (DMO), both are forms of conventional stacking method, and also Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stacking method. These three stacking methods are carried out using velocity analysis resulted from its respective method. After the stacking process, the results of NMO, DMO, and CRS velocity analysis were also used for Kirchhoff prestack time migration (PSTM) process. These three methods will be tested to see which one of these methods can produce the best seismic image. The data used in this research is 3D synthetic seismic data of Gulf AK model. Because this model has a subsurface structure with significant dipping difference, the CRS method is expected to produce better seismic cross section. This is because CRS method uses three different stacking operators while conventional method only uses one. These three stacking operators are all affected by the dipping of the reflector. Comparative analysis of the stacking results will be assessed qualitatively based on their velocity semblance, their final seismic cross section, extracted wavelet, and the amplitude spectrum. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
description |
Reflection seismic data processing aims to produce image of Earth’s subsurface
layers. A series of steps and various processing methods are carried out in hopes
of increasing signal-to-noise ratio in order to produce the most representative
subsurface image. Some important steps in reflection seismic data processing are
stacking and migration. There are three stacking methods that were used in this
research, which are Normal Moveout (NMO) and Dip Moveout (DMO), both are
forms of conventional stacking method, and also Common Reflection Surface
(CRS) stacking method. These three stacking methods are carried out using
velocity analysis resulted from its respective method. After the stacking process,
the results of NMO, DMO, and CRS velocity analysis were also used for Kirchhoff
prestack time migration (PSTM) process. These three methods will be tested to
see which one of these methods can produce the best seismic image.
The data used in this research is 3D synthetic seismic data of Gulf AK model.
Because this model has a subsurface structure with significant dipping difference,
the CRS method is expected to produce better seismic cross section. This is
because CRS method uses three different stacking operators while conventional
method only uses one. These three stacking operators are all affected by the
dipping of the reflector. Comparative analysis of the stacking results will be
assessed qualitatively based on their velocity semblance, their final seismic cross
section, extracted wavelet, and the amplitude spectrum. |
format |
Final Project |
author |
Tabina Joebhaar, Diya |
spellingShingle |
Tabina Joebhaar, Diya 3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
author_facet |
Tabina Joebhaar, Diya |
author_sort |
Tabina Joebhaar, Diya |
title |
3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
title_short |
3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
title_full |
3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
title_fullStr |
3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
title_full_unstemmed |
3D SEISMIC IMAGE QUALITY STUDY WITH VELOCITY ANALYSIS RESULTED FROM NMO, DMO, AND CRS METHOD |
title_sort |
3d seismic image quality study with velocity analysis resulted from nmo, dmo, and crs method |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53214 |
_version_ |
1822001453186678784 |