ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract

<b>Abstract: </b><p align=\"justify\"> Ramsey theory was initially studied in the context of the problem of finding a regular procedure to determine the consistency of any given logical formula (1928). Then, this theory becomes famous after Paul Erdos and George Szekeres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Surahmat
Format: Dissertations
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/5544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:5544
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description <b>Abstract: </b><p align=\"justify\"> Ramsey theory was initially studied in the context of the problem of finding a regular procedure to determine the consistency of any given logical formula (1928). Then, this theory becomes famous after Paul Erdos and George Szekeres (1935) applied it in graph theory. The idea behind the classical Ramsey number is basically the following. For any positive integers a and b, we would like to determine the smallest integer R = R(a, b) so that every graph F of R vertices will satisfy the following condition: either F has K<sub>a</sub> as a subgraph or the complement of F has K<sub>b</sub> as a subgraph.<p align=\"justify\"> The research on finding the exact value of classical Ramsey numbers R(a, b) has received a lot of attention. How-ever, the results are still far from satisfactory. Since firstly introduced, there are only nine exact Ramsey numbers known so far.<p align=\"justify\"> Next, the study of the classical Ramsey number has been generalized in various forms. One of them is called graph Ramsey numbers. The study of graph Ramsey numbers has grown enormously in the last four decades to be-come presently one of the most active areas in Ramsey theory. A mayor impetus behind the early development of graph Ramsey number was the hope that it would eventually leads to methods for determining larger value of the classical Ramsey numbers R(a, b). However, as often happens in mathematics, this hope has not been realized; rather, the field has blossomed into a discipline of its own.<p align=\"justify\"> Let G and H be two graphs. Basically, the graph Ramsey number R(G, H) is defined as the smallest integer N such that every graph F of order N will satisfy the following condition: either F has G as a subgraph or the complement of F has H as a subgraph.<p align=\"justify\"> In this dissertation, we shall study on the determination of graph Ramsey numbers R(G, W<sub>m</sub>) for some fixed G and a wheel W<sub>m</sub> of (m + 1) vertices. In particular, we consider G as a path P<sub>n</sub>, a star S<sub>n</sub>, a tree T<sub>n</sub>, a star-like Y<sub>n,l<sub>1</sub>,...,l<sub>k</sub></sub>, a linear forest L<sub>p</sub> or a cycle C<sub>n</sub>.<p align=\"justify\"> In order to obtain the graph Ramsey number R(G, W<sub>m</sub>), we firstly determine the lower bound by using the Chvátal and Harary\'s theorem (1972). However, in some cases, the lower bound given by Chvátal and Harary\'s theorem is not good enough. So, we have to increase the lower bound by finding corresponding (G, W<sub>m</sub>)—good graphs. To find the graph Ramsey numbers, we have to show that the upper bound coincide with the lower bound. In most cases, we use the induction process.<p align=\"justify\"> The main results of the dissertation are in the following. We show that R(P<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</Sub>) = 2n—1 form even and n &#8805; m &#8805; 4, and R(P<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) = 3n — 2 for m even and n &#8805; m &#8805; 3.<p align=\"justify\"> For a star S<sub>n</sub>, we obtain the graph Ramsey numbers R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n odd and n &#8805; 3; R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n + 1 for n even and n &#8805; 4, R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n—2 for n &#8805; 3. In general, we show that R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) = 3n — 2 for m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4.<p align=\"justify\"> If G is a tree T<sub>n</sub> other than a star, then we obtain the graph Ramsey number R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n &#8805; 4, and R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n — 2 for n &#8805; 3. For particular form of trees, we also obtain the graph Ramsey number R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) for m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4 where TT, is a star-like. We are able to obtain the graph Ramsey numbers R(L<sub>p</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) where L<sub>p</sub> is a linear forest and m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4.<p al ign=\"justify\"> Our final result concerns with the finding of R(C<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>). We show that R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 9, R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 10, R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>6</sub>) = 9, R(C<sub>n</sub>,W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n &#8805; 5, and R(C<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n — 2 for n &#8805; 5.
format Dissertations
author Surahmat
spellingShingle Surahmat
ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
author_facet Surahmat
author_sort Surahmat
title ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
title_short ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
title_full ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
title_fullStr ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
title_full_unstemmed ON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract
title_sort on the graph ramsey number for a wheel: dissertation abstract
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/5544
_version_ 1820663716530618368
spelling id-itb.:55442006-01-05T17:29:19ZON THE GRAPH RAMSEY NUMBER FOR A WHEEL: Dissertation abstract Surahmat Indonesia Dissertations INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/5544 <b>Abstract: </b><p align=\"justify\"> Ramsey theory was initially studied in the context of the problem of finding a regular procedure to determine the consistency of any given logical formula (1928). Then, this theory becomes famous after Paul Erdos and George Szekeres (1935) applied it in graph theory. The idea behind the classical Ramsey number is basically the following. For any positive integers a and b, we would like to determine the smallest integer R = R(a, b) so that every graph F of R vertices will satisfy the following condition: either F has K<sub>a</sub> as a subgraph or the complement of F has K<sub>b</sub> as a subgraph.<p align=\"justify\"> The research on finding the exact value of classical Ramsey numbers R(a, b) has received a lot of attention. How-ever, the results are still far from satisfactory. Since firstly introduced, there are only nine exact Ramsey numbers known so far.<p align=\"justify\"> Next, the study of the classical Ramsey number has been generalized in various forms. One of them is called graph Ramsey numbers. The study of graph Ramsey numbers has grown enormously in the last four decades to be-come presently one of the most active areas in Ramsey theory. A mayor impetus behind the early development of graph Ramsey number was the hope that it would eventually leads to methods for determining larger value of the classical Ramsey numbers R(a, b). However, as often happens in mathematics, this hope has not been realized; rather, the field has blossomed into a discipline of its own.<p align=\"justify\"> Let G and H be two graphs. Basically, the graph Ramsey number R(G, H) is defined as the smallest integer N such that every graph F of order N will satisfy the following condition: either F has G as a subgraph or the complement of F has H as a subgraph.<p align=\"justify\"> In this dissertation, we shall study on the determination of graph Ramsey numbers R(G, W<sub>m</sub>) for some fixed G and a wheel W<sub>m</sub> of (m + 1) vertices. In particular, we consider G as a path P<sub>n</sub>, a star S<sub>n</sub>, a tree T<sub>n</sub>, a star-like Y<sub>n,l<sub>1</sub>,...,l<sub>k</sub></sub>, a linear forest L<sub>p</sub> or a cycle C<sub>n</sub>.<p align=\"justify\"> In order to obtain the graph Ramsey number R(G, W<sub>m</sub>), we firstly determine the lower bound by using the Chvátal and Harary\'s theorem (1972). However, in some cases, the lower bound given by Chvátal and Harary\'s theorem is not good enough. So, we have to increase the lower bound by finding corresponding (G, W<sub>m</sub>)—good graphs. To find the graph Ramsey numbers, we have to show that the upper bound coincide with the lower bound. In most cases, we use the induction process.<p align=\"justify\"> The main results of the dissertation are in the following. We show that R(P<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</Sub>) = 2n—1 form even and n &#8805; m &#8805; 4, and R(P<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) = 3n — 2 for m even and n &#8805; m &#8805; 3.<p align=\"justify\"> For a star S<sub>n</sub>, we obtain the graph Ramsey numbers R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n odd and n &#8805; 3; R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n + 1 for n even and n &#8805; 4, R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n—2 for n &#8805; 3. In general, we show that R(S<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) = 3n — 2 for m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4.<p align=\"justify\"> If G is a tree T<sub>n</sub> other than a star, then we obtain the graph Ramsey number R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n &#8805; 4, and R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n — 2 for n &#8805; 3. For particular form of trees, we also obtain the graph Ramsey number R(T<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) for m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4 where TT, is a star-like. We are able to obtain the graph Ramsey numbers R(L<sub>p</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>) where L<sub>p</sub> is a linear forest and m odd, m &#8805; 5 and n &#8805; 2m — 4.<p al ign=\"justify\"> Our final result concerns with the finding of R(C<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>m</sub>). We show that R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>4</sub>) = 9, R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 10, R(C<sub>4</sub>, W<sub>6</sub>) = 9, R(C<sub>n</sub>,W<sub>4</sub>) = 2n — 1 for n &#8805; 5, and R(C<sub>n</sub>, W<sub>5</sub>) = 3n — 2 for n &#8805; 5. text