IMPLEMENTATION OF COGNITIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR DISSOLVED GAS ANALYSIS (DGA) INTERPRETATION IN TRANSFORMERS
Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) is a method that can detect transformer faults based on the dissolved gas content in transformer oil. Some of the methods commonly used for DGA interpretation includes: Total Dissolved Combustible Gases (TDCG), Key Gases, Duval Triangle Method, Roger's Ratio M...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/55641 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) is a method that can detect transformer faults
based on the dissolved gas content in transformer oil. Some of the methods
commonly used for DGA interpretation includes: Total Dissolved Combustible
Gases (TDCG), Key Gases, Duval Triangle Method, Roger's Ratio Method
(RRM), and Doernenburg Ratio Method (DRM). In recent years, Artificial
Intelligence (AI) methods such as Fuzzy Inference Systems (FIS), Artificial Neural
Networks (ANN), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) have been applied for DGA
interpretation. Today, there is a new method that works based on Knowledge
Growing System (KGS), it's called Cognitive Artificial Intelligence (CAI).
Previous studies (Octavianus, 2018), have applied the CAI based on DRM method
for the DGA interpretation. However, in his research, there were several errors in
the use of ratios, data input, and "not significant" conditions in the grouping
process. This paper improves that. In addition, the previous study used a dataset
labeled IEC TC 10. This study retested the same data and also tested secondary
data referring to 6 Paper, primary data referring to 6 Transformers data from GI
PT PLN (Persero) Transmission Main Unit West Java (UITJBB), and a small
amount of data with reference to 2 Paper and 2 Transformer data from the GI PT
PLN (Persero) UITJBB.
The results show in this study that the accuracy of CAI decreased from previous
studies. The accuracy in this study decreased from 98.29% to 94.87% for CAI 0
and 95.73% for CAI 1. This study also tested other methods such as FIS with an
accuracy of 94.02%, Duval Triangle 87.18%, RRM 0.68%, and DRM 55.56% for
the same data. Thus, the implementation of CAI can increase DRM accuracy from
55.56% to 94.87% for CAI 0 and 95.73% for CAI 1. The results of the analysis on
the IEC TC 10 dataset, secondary data (6 journals), primary data (6 PLN GI
transformer) and the small amount of data show that CAI can give the highest
accuracy. Thus, these methods are not limited to the amount of data and this
method can be implemented on small amounts of data.
|
---|