STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL
Land reclamation will become more challenging in the future due the depleting availability and rising cost of granular fill materials. One solution is to use dredged mud from a nearby riverbed or from the surrounding seabed. The main goal of this final project is to analyze the effectiveness of u...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/55871 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:55871 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:558712021-06-19T19:26:06ZSTUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL Bratanata, Jonathan Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan) Indonesia Final Project dredged mud, soil improvement, PVD, vacuum, cement, rigid inclusion, cost analysis INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/55871 Land reclamation will become more challenging in the future due the depleting availability and rising cost of granular fill materials. One solution is to use dredged mud from a nearby riverbed or from the surrounding seabed. The main goal of this final project is to analyze the effectiveness of using dredged mud as the main fill material in land reclamation. Because the dredged mud used mainly consist of soft clay and has a high water content, it has a relatively low bearing capacity and high compressibility level. That is why soil improvement must be carried out. The soil improvement methods explored in this study are prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) with vacuum preloading, cement mixed dredged mud, and rigid inclusion. Each method was analyzed based on their individual specifications and characteristics so that the output is a design recommendation for each method. Based on each design recommendation, a cost analysis has been conducted for each method of soil improvement. The output of that analysis has been compared with the conventional method of land reclamation which uses granular fill with the base soil being treated with PVD and preloading. The results of these analysis are that the PVD with vacuum preloading method is the most efficient method based on the method of construction and cost. Using the recommended designs, the cement treated dredged mud and rigid inclusion methods have a similar cost to the conventional method of reclamation while having a more complex method of construction. However, as the process is refined and optimized for both the cement treated dredged mud and rigid inclusion methods, then both methods can be a viable alternative for land reclamation using dredged mud as the fill material. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
topic |
Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan) |
spellingShingle |
Teknik (Rekayasa, enjinering dan kegiatan berkaitan) Bratanata, Jonathan STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
description |
Land reclamation will become more challenging in the future due the depleting
availability and rising cost of granular fill materials. One solution is to use dredged
mud from a nearby riverbed or from the surrounding seabed.
The main goal of this final project is to analyze the effectiveness of using dredged
mud as the main fill material in land reclamation. Because the dredged mud used
mainly consist of soft clay and has a high water content, it has a relatively low
bearing capacity and high compressibility level. That is why soil improvement must
be carried out. The soil improvement methods explored in this study are
prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) with vacuum preloading, cement mixed dredged
mud, and rigid inclusion. Each method was analyzed based on their individual
specifications and characteristics so that the output is a design recommendation for
each method.
Based on each design recommendation, a cost analysis has been conducted for each
method of soil improvement. The output of that analysis has been compared with
the conventional method of land reclamation which uses granular fill with the base
soil being treated with PVD and preloading.
The results of these analysis are that the PVD with vacuum preloading method is
the most efficient method based on the method of construction and cost. Using the
recommended designs, the cement treated dredged mud and rigid inclusion methods
have a similar cost to the conventional method of reclamation while having a more
complex method of construction. However, as the process is refined and optimized
for both the cement treated dredged mud and rigid inclusion methods, then both
methods can be a viable alternative for land reclamation using dredged mud as the
fill material.
|
format |
Final Project |
author |
Bratanata, Jonathan |
author_facet |
Bratanata, Jonathan |
author_sort |
Bratanata, Jonathan |
title |
STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
title_short |
STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
title_full |
STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
title_fullStr |
STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
title_full_unstemmed |
STUDY OF SOIL IMPROVEMENT OF LAND RECLAMATION USING DREDGED MUD AS THE FILL MATERIAL |
title_sort |
study of soil improvement of land reclamation using dredged mud as the fill material |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/55871 |
_version_ |
1822002189780910080 |