PPLICATION ANALYSIS OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAIC (BIPV) CONCEPT ON INDONESIA ONE TOWER
Indonesia has commit to reach renewable energy mix up to 23% by 2025. But, the progress is lagging behind with only 9% due to the lack of contribution of community through PV solar rooftops. One of the solution of this problem is through Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV), a concept to in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Project |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/55953 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Indonesia has commit to reach renewable energy mix up to 23% by 2025. But, the progress
is lagging behind with only 9% due to the lack of contribution of community through PV solar
rooftops. One of the solution of this problem is through Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV),
a concept to integrate PV to buildings by replacing construction material with PV. This research
will discuss the application analysis of BIPV in Indonesia One Tower in Jakarta. The BIPV
installation at the Indonesia One Tower is installed on the 3 sides on South Tower (Roof, North
East, North West) and 2 sides on North Tower (North East, North West). The components used
are Qingdao Power World type PW100A PV Module (a-Si, 100 Wp), Inverter Fronius IG PLUS
V 6.0-1 UNI 6KW, and BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 10.2 (for the BIPV with BESS scenario.)
With the help of PVSyst software, it is known that the system produced more than 132 MWh of
energy in one year. Without BESS, the system can served around 43% of the total load. With
BESS, it can served 51% of the total load. The LCOE of the scenario without BESS is Rp
847.977/kWh (North Tower) and Rp989.31/kWh (South Tower). Meanwhile, the LCOE in the
BIPV with BESS scenario are Rp2261.272 /kWh (North Tower) and Rp 2119.9425/kWh (South
Tower). After the simulation, it is concluded that installing BESS in the system is not profitable
with the ROI of -48% (North Tower) and -46.2% (South Tower). |
|---|