IDENTIFICATION OF CHANGES BECAUSE OF BUMDES CLEAN WATER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ON ACCESS AND SOCIAL ECONOMIC COMMUNITIES IN SOME VILLAGES IN BANDUNG REGENCY

• Main Author: Nur Hanifa, Salsabila
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/57008
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

The Human Rights to Water and Sanitation (HRWAS) is a principle that recognizes that clean drinking water and sanitation are very important for everyone's life (UN, 2010). The availability of clean water that is inadequate or of low quality can have a negative impact on humans. Unfortunately, in Indonesia there are still many areas that are difficult to get access to clean water that is suitable for use, especially in rural areas. Drought and clean water crisis are also issues in Sukamenak Village, Margahayu Tengah Village, and Sulaeman Village in Bandung Regency, but these problems have been handled. These three regions were chosen on the grounds that there are large differences in service coverage, even though all three were provided with clean water infrastructure assistance (deep wells) by the Disperkimtan. The differences between the three are, Sukamenak Village was the first village to be given the program in 2007 and can continue it until now, Margahayu Tengah Village was first funded in 2015 but the service coverage has exceeded Sukamenak Village, which is up to 100%, and Sulaeman Village whose development coincided with Central Margahayu in terms of service coverage has only reached 1.5%. Therefore, the researcher aims to further identify changes that occur with the existence of clean water infrastructure managed by BUMDes in terms of objective access including quantity, quality, and accessibility as well as changes that occur from the socio-economic perspective of the community. The socio-economic aspects of the community need to be identified so that they can become lessons and motivations for other villages that have not yet developed and managed the provision of BUMDes funds optimally. The socio-economic aspects that are used as indicators in this study are:health, education, public interest, community income and expenditure, tariffs, other operational costs, utilization of residual costs, medical expenses, time to fulfill clean water, business/work opportunities, changes in land value, increased agricultural production, company investment, opening of tourist sites , as well as payables and other operating costs. Regarding the research approach, this study is classified as a retrospective study with an explanatory nature and uses a quantitative and qualitative approach or can be called a mixed method. The data obtained were then analyzed using Hypothesis Testing as the main analysis supported by descriptive and qualitative descriptiveiv statistical analysis. The research hypothesis was taken based on the literature related to the influence of clean water infrastructure on the socio-economic community. Based on this, the research hypothesis sentence taken is that the development of clean water infrastructure can provide changes to community access, social and economic conditions. After the analysis, it can be concluded that for indicators of quantity, utilization rate, water clarity, dryness intensity, aroma, color, taste, particles or sand in water, access methods, disease intensity, student attendance, additional operational costs, and treatment costs are the same as described above. obtained based on previous literature that the development of clean water infrastructure provides changes to these indicators for the better than before. Unfortunately, for indicators of flow conditions, flow duration, and other cost changes, the changes are worse than the previous conditions, especially in the non-dry season. In addition, it was found that indicators of distance, expenditure, tariffs, collection time, tariff rates, utilization of residual costs, opportunities to open businesses, land values, job creation or the emergence of business opportunities, increased agricultural production, investment, and tourist sites did not change. any. This can happen because the allotment of water use is only for household consumption. Based on this research, it is recommended that the program for providing clean water infrastructure managed by BUMDes can be continued with several notes such as the need for good management tools and village government support, increasing the quantity and continuity of water, socializing the time and solutions if there will be repairs or cleaning of the main tower. , and need to prioritize villages that can be assessed in terms of geography and community interests.