BENCH BLASTING DESIGN OPTIMIZATION USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM (MOGA)
The blasting design in several mines only uses an empirical approach (R.L Ash or Konya) as a reference, and trial and error are carried out to obtain the desired fragmentation. Optimal fragmentation is required so that there are no fragment sizes that are too large (secondary blasting or rock bre...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/57372 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The blasting design in several mines only uses an empirical approach (R.L Ash or Konya) as a
reference, and trial and error are carried out to obtain the desired fragmentation. Optimal
fragmentation is required so that there are no fragment sizes that are too large (secondary blasting
or rock breaker is required) or fragment sizes that are too small (reduced recovery volume) which
can reduce productivity.
Therefore, an optimization method is needed to produce optimal fragmentation, uniformity index,
and PPV value. One of the optimization methods is Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA)
with the average fragmentation value and uniformity index as the objective function to obtain an
explosion design that is able to produce optimal fragmentation values quickly with a small fitness
value (<0,5) so that a research entitled " Blasting Design Optimization Using Multi-Objective
Genetic Algorithm (MOGA)" was made.
The value of burden, space, subdrill, and stemming is obtained for each location and the excavator
used by using the MOGA optimization application with fitness value < 0,5 with a relatively fast
time (average 12 seconds). Data validation shows the average value of Mean Absolute Percentage
Error (MAPE) between the Kuz-Ram formula with the image analysis method with split-desktop
aplikasi using data from a gold mine in West Sumbawa is 3,22%, which means the Kuz-Ram model
is good for calculating the value of rock fragmentation from blasting activity. There is a difference
of up to 1,7 meters in the blasting design used by one of the gold mines in West Sumbawa to the
optimized blasting design, burden and space in optimization design has wider spacing, making it
more profitable |
---|