DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RAIL CARRIER FOR R60 RAILS WITH 50 METERS LONG TRANSPORT CROSS TURNOUT
This research is based on the Jakarta-Bandung KCIC project. The objective of this project is to expand the rail network in Indonesia and improve the quality of PT KAI's services. In this project, it is necessary to transport the R60 rail with a length of 50 meters by a train. A rail support...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/57684 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | This research is based on the Jakarta-Bandung KCIC project. The objective of this
project is to expand the rail network in Indonesia and improve the quality of PT KAI's
services. In this project, it is necessary to transport the R60 rail with a length of 50 meters by
a train. A rail support is needed to hold the rail so the rail is not thrown from the carriage
when passing through turnout. The objective of this study is to design a safe rail support to
withstand the load and analyze the design strength of the rail support when it passes the
turnout.
In this study, the kinematics and dynamics of the train were modeled using Universal
Mechanism. Objective of simulations is to determine the force generated by the rail being
transported against the rail support. The support modeling was carried out on SolidWorks
2019 and continued with static and fatigue loads simulation using the finite element method.
Simulations were carried out to analyze the stress, deformation, strain, safety factor and life
cycle of designs. The results of this simulation are compared with the required criteria and
an assessment is carried out to determine the design quality.
Kinematics and dynamics simulation has been carried out and resulted a smaller load
on the rail configuration without rail partition. There are 6 alternative designs that are
modeled in this study. After loading test, it is known that alternative design 2 has the best
safety factor over design weight and the best life cycle. After quality evaluation, the final
design of this research is the second alternative design with a safety factor value of 2.965 and
a life cycle of 1,000,000 cycles. |
---|