PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM

Network traffic classification is an identification process of network applications like Yahoo, YouTube, Facebook, and Skype. Network traffic classification is required by network management to manage resources and to know different applications that can help network operators provide good Qualit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robbani, Arba
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/60926
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:60926
spelling id-itb.:609262021-09-21T12:13:08ZPERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM Robbani, Arba Indonesia Theses feature sets, one-vs-rest, random forest, multiclass, imbalance data, network traffic, classification, flow-based, session-based, time-based, packet-based INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/60926 Network traffic classification is an identification process of network applications like Yahoo, YouTube, Facebook, and Skype. Network traffic classification is required by network management to manage resources and to know different applications that can help network operators provide good Quality of Service, secure network, and monitor network. In this thesis, we focused on the 7th layer of OSI model and using only TCP data. In recent years, there is much machine learning research to solve this problem either using supervised, unsupervised, or deep learning. Different feature sets are used to find the best performance for network traffic classification using Recursive Feature Elimination feature selections and One-Vs-Rest Random Forest classifiers. Six sets are compared: flow-based, session-based, time-based, packet-based, flow+session-based, and packet+time-based. Furthermore, we have class imbalance problems in multiclass that make this difficult due to imbalance distribution, presence of outliers, and irrelevant features. Using this method, we can solve these problems. From the experiment, we get flow-based as the best feature set for network traffic classification with f1-score 0.81, GM 0.85, and model build time is 2634.987s. We also can use packet-based, flow+session-based, and packet+time-based with a good classifier but need more time to model build. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description Network traffic classification is an identification process of network applications like Yahoo, YouTube, Facebook, and Skype. Network traffic classification is required by network management to manage resources and to know different applications that can help network operators provide good Quality of Service, secure network, and monitor network. In this thesis, we focused on the 7th layer of OSI model and using only TCP data. In recent years, there is much machine learning research to solve this problem either using supervised, unsupervised, or deep learning. Different feature sets are used to find the best performance for network traffic classification using Recursive Feature Elimination feature selections and One-Vs-Rest Random Forest classifiers. Six sets are compared: flow-based, session-based, time-based, packet-based, flow+session-based, and packet+time-based. Furthermore, we have class imbalance problems in multiclass that make this difficult due to imbalance distribution, presence of outliers, and irrelevant features. Using this method, we can solve these problems. From the experiment, we get flow-based as the best feature set for network traffic classification with f1-score 0.81, GM 0.85, and model build time is 2634.987s. We also can use packet-based, flow+session-based, and packet+time-based with a good classifier but need more time to model build.
format Theses
author Robbani, Arba
spellingShingle Robbani, Arba
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
author_facet Robbani, Arba
author_sort Robbani, Arba
title PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
title_short PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
title_full PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
title_fullStr PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
title_full_unstemmed PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FEATURE SETS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC CLASSIFICATION USING RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION FEATURE SELECTION AND ONE-VS-REST RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
title_sort performance comparison of different feature sets for network traffic classification using recursive feature elimination feature selection and one-vs-rest random forest algorithm
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/60926
_version_ 1822931514084556800