PEMODELAN ATRIBUT SEISMIK LAMBDA-MURHO BERDASARKAN KAJIAN ROCK PHYSICS
Rock physics theory used to convert the reservoir data (porosity, saturation, mineralogy, temperature, pressure, etc.) into seismic data (P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, density). And also by using this theory, seismic synthetic modeling has been done to see seismic data change (amplitude) beco...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62527 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Rock physics theory used to convert the reservoir data (porosity, saturation,
mineralogy, temperature, pressure, etc.) into seismic data (P-wave velocity, S-wave
velocity, density). And also by using this theory, seismic synthetic modeling has
been done to see seismic data change (amplitude) becouse of pore fluid change and
Lambda-Mu-Rho model to see physical parameter change (Lambda-Mu-Rho) that
caused by the changes of reservoir data (saturation, porosity, mineralogy).
Research was started by doing correction to the log data in order to match it
with the form that will be needed in next step. From the research that has been done
before, we choose equations that suit to the reality (field condition). After we choose
the equations which able to convert the acoustic data into reservoir data, we did
seismic synthetic modeling rock that saturated by gas, oil and brine. We also did
cross-plot modeling between the changes of Lambda-Rho, Mu-Rho to the changes of
reservoir data (porosity, mineralogy and saturation).
Calculation by using combination methods approximation (Hashin-
Shtrikmann, Dvorkin, dan Gassmann) shows better result for calculate P-wave
velocity and S-wave velocity than effective medium approximation, whether using
Voigt-Reuss or Hashin-Shtrikman approximation. The result we acquire from
seismic synthetic modeling shows the present of AVO anomaly for each kind of fluid
contain. The result from the cross plot between the changes of Lambda-Rho to the
changes of reservoir data (porosity, mineralogy and saturation) is we know the gas
lies between 4 GPa*gr/cc – 12 GPa*gr/cc. While the result from the cross plot
between the changes of Mu-Rho to the changes of reservoir data (porosity,
mineralogy and saturation) is we know the position of the reservoir lies between 20
GPa*gr/cc – 60 GPa*gr/cc. Both of this cross plot using cut-off porosity between
10% - 20%. |
---|