PEER-TO-PEER LENDING TYPE OF LOANS, CEO CHARACTERISTICS, AND NON-PERFORMING LOANS: CASE IN INDONESIA
Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending is an alternative solution for small-medium enterprises (SME) and personal underserved by Bank. The loan accumulation of registered Indonesia P2P lending reached over IDR 194 trillion in April 2021 (OJK, 2021). As the loan accumulation increased, the NPL of platforms al...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertations |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62798 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending is an alternative solution for small-medium enterprises
(SME) and personal underserved by Bank. The loan accumulation of registered
Indonesia P2P lending reached over IDR 194 trillion in April 2021 (OJK, 2021). As
the loan accumulation increased, the NPL of platforms also increased. This research
elaborates the platform’s factor that relates to the NPL of the P2P lending platform.
The dataset comes from 61 OJK registered platforms registered in OJK in the
research period (May 2019 – April 2021). As already explored before by another
researcher, loan amount and pandemic condition is used as control variables in this
research. This research use panel data analysis to minimize the bias of the result.
P2P lending can offer a few types of loans on a platform. This research classified
types of loan that is offered in the platform based on loan purpose into two types:
consumptive loans (cash loan, employee loan, and product/service loan), and
productive loans (SME loan, supply chain loan, project loan, invoice loan, and
online seller loan).
This research showed that consumptive loans, significantly employee loans,
positively relate to NPL. Conversely, productive loans (significantly online seller
loans, SME loans, and supply chain loans) relate negatively to NPL. This research
also explores that the CEO’s age is consistently related to the platform’s NPL.
Having a license is not significantly related to NPL in Indonesia’s P2P lending.
The platform that offers the productive loan is needed to develop by stakeholders
to increase SME access to the capital. The platform that offers the consumptive loan
has to increase the credit scoring capacity and manage the loan features. Profile of
CEO determines the platform’s performance, especially the age of CEO. The
platform that has older CEO relates negatively to NPL. The abroad education
experience of the CEO is used as an instrumental variable to age to handle the
endogeneity problem. The more years a CEO has abroad education experience, the
more effect of CEO’s age to platform’s NPL.
The determination effect between loan portfolios offered in the platform is
significant to be acknowledged by the P2P lending stakeholders. The regulator also
ii
needs to maintain the industry to fill the gap of capital access, but at the same time
not become a digital loan shark, like a payday loan, and ruin the image of the
industry itself. This research will benefit the regulator as considerations when
creating a regulation that develops the P2P lending industry for the future. The
findings also benefit the platform owner to decision making and strategy planning.
For the future researcher, this research will give an insight into the condition of
Indonesia’s P2P lending industry during the research period and find a direction
what have to find out to develop this industry more sustainable in the future. |
---|