PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME INFILLED WITH LIGHTWEIGHT MATERIAL UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOAD
It has been established that the more the weight of infill materials used for infilled reinforced concrete (R/C) frame structures, the more the earthquake forces generated in the structures. One way to reduce the mobilization of the earthquake forces in in-filled frames structures is by using lig...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/64391 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | It has been established that the more the weight of infill materials used for infilled
reinforced concrete (R/C) frame structures, the more the earthquake forces
generated in the structures. One way to reduce the mobilization of the earthquake
forces in in-filled frames structures is by using lightweight infill materials.
Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) is one of the lightweight materials that can be
used as infill materials. However, the knowledge on the behavior of frame
structures in-filled with lightweight materials, such as AAC blocks, under in-plane
lateral loads is still limited. This thesis presents experimental research conducted
to study the in-plane behavior of R/C frames in-filled with AAC blocks. The tests
are performed on two single bay, single story in-filled frame specimens with ½
scale models. One of the test specimens is in-filled with conventional clay brick
materials and the other is in-filled with AAC blocks. The loading used in the tests
is in the form of cyclic in-plane lateral loads, simulating earthquake forces. The
objective of the tests is to study the influence of physical and mechanical
characteristics of the infill materials used on the resulting seismic performance of
the test specimens. Behavior of the frame structures is evaluated through the
observed strength and deformation characteristics, and also through the measured
hysteretic energy dissipation capability. The test results showed that at failure
AAC infill developed strut mechanism in the form of diagonal cracking. On the
other hand, clay infill exhibited mode of failure in the form of sliding shear and
partial infill crushing. The strength and cumulative energy dissipation of both
specimens exhibited similar behavior throughout the tests. Although at the
beginning clay infill posses higher initial stiffness, the AAC infill produced less
stiffness degradation and demonstrated better hysteretic behavior than the clay
infill. Because of that, it can be concluded from this study that AAC block units
can provide good behavior of in-filled frame under lateral load. Therefore, these
materials can basically be used to replace clay brick units as infill materials for
R/C frames built in the earthquake prone region. |
---|