PREDICTION OF STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND GRADUATION TIME USING LSTM AND GRU
High drop out rates and low student performance are unavoidable problems for educational institutions, both national and international. In order to anticipating the continued growth in the number of students drop out, predicting students who are at risk of drop out is important. Consequently, thi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/65780 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | High drop out rates and low student performance are unavoidable problems for
educational institutions, both national and international. In order to anticipating the
continued growth in the number of students drop out, predicting students who are
at risk of drop out is important. Consequently, this study presents an automated
technique to predict student performance and graduation using student data with
separated and combined prediction method. The data is collected from a study
program at a university in Bandung. Data preprocessing is done to produce a dataset
with common features to predict the two tasks. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)
and Gate Recurrent Units (GRU) as an outstanding model in handling sequence
data was proposed in this study. According to our study, the LSTM and GRU
architectures performed well in predicting each task. The performance of each
architecture was surpassed each other depending on the corresponding task. On the
task at graduation, the F1-score of the best model has reached 94% and on the
student performance task, the F1-score is 86%. While in the combined task the
resulting F1-score value is 73%. In early prediction, the prediction of graduation
time can provide good performance since the second semester with an F1-score of
83%. Meanwhile, in predicting student achievement, the RMSE value has met the
rules of thumb since the second semester of 0.426. Overall student performance and
graduation prediction are better when using separate methods compared to
combined methods. In this study, the use of dropout layers tends to degrade model
performance. Furthermore, the preprocessing data and baseline model generated in
this study can be replicated for similar tasks at other universities with feature
adjustments based on data availability. |
---|