PENENTUAN HEADING MENGGUNAKAN PRODUK ORBIT DAN WAKTU TELITI DARI QZSS
Quasi Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) is a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology system belonging to the Japanese government, whose satellites have orbits and operate in Indonesian territory. Positioning activities using satellites from QZSS are carried out using the Real-Time Preci...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/65910 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Quasi Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) is a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)
technology system belonging to the Japanese government, whose satellites have orbits and
operate in Indonesian territory. Positioning activities using satellites from QZSS are carried out
using the Real-Time Precise Point Positioning (RTPPP) method in absolute terms with orbit
and clock errors correction obtained directly from the QZSS satellite. Currently, the Magellan
System Japan (MSJ) receiver has the feature to be able to receive precise orbit and clock
correction, and can perform heading determinations using the QZSS satellite. The purpose of
this research is to test the accuracy performance of heading data which is estimated using
precise clock and orbit correction from the satellite. To find out these problems, in this study,
heading data acquisition was carried out using precise orbit and clock correction from QZSS
using a static and kinematic MSJ receiver, then the acquisition data would be compared with
the heading data obtained using several other heading data acquisition observation methods
using RT- PPP RTX, static GNSS and Total Station.
The results of the comparison of absolute static headings estimated using the correction from
the QZSS satellite with static GNSS have a difference of up to 0.022º, the comparison with the
total station has a difference of up to 0.285º, while for comparison with RT-PPP RTX has a
difference of about 0.18º. Comparison of kinematic heading data using corrections from the
QZSS satellite with static GNSS, has a difference of up to 0.524º and for comparison with RTPPP
RTX kinematics, has a difference of up to 0.21º. Based on these results, it can be concluded
that the level of precision and accuracy of the heading data estimated using corrections from
the QZSS satellite acquired using the MSJ receiver will adjust to the acquisition method used,
as well as reviewing the error and measurement conditions in the comparison method used. In
the static position, the level of precision and accuracy produced has a better value when
compared to the kinematic position, in terms of the standard deviation value and the difference
in the value of the comparison. |
---|