IMPROVING COLLABORATION PROCESS AND WORKING EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRM
This thesis reports the study to improve the collaboration process and working employment relationships among the four teams in a professional services firm. The study is constructed into two complementary parts, and each part of the study is designed to address the relevant research questions; t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertations |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66836 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | This thesis reports the study to improve the collaboration process and working
employment relationships among the four teams in a professional services firm. The
study is constructed into two complementary parts, and each part of the study is
designed to address the relevant research questions; then, the findings of both parts
are combined for a broader and deeper understanding and conclusion. Part-1 of the
study is conducted to learn the effects of firm governance on the collaboration
process dimensions in a public corporation type of professional service firm with
one global integrated organization structure and a partnership type of professional
service firm with network organization structure. One conceptual model is
developed to structure the analysis and guide five expert interviews. It finds that in
the public corporation type of professional service firm, with one global integrated
organization structure, the structural dimension of the collaboration process plays a
more significant role than the agency and social capital dimension in establishing
the collaboration process.
On the contrary, in the partnership type of professional service firm, with a network
organization structure, the social capital and the agency dimensions of the
collaboration process play a more significant role than the structural dimension in
establishing the collaboration process. It leads to the practical implementation in a
partnership type of professional service firm, and the collaboration process would
be started by building the social capital and agency dimensions. In a public
corporation type of professional service firm, the collaboration process would be
started by following the structural dimensions because being a public corporation
forces the firm to have a defined and documented governance and administration
(structural dimension).
Part-2 of the study aims to fill a knowledge gap in the collaboration process and
learn the practical ways to establish it. It is done by implementing a Soft Systems
Methodology-based Action Research (SSM-based AR) study to improve the
collaborative working relationship among the four teams in one of the Big Four
firms serving one global multinational client. The Big Four is the nickname used to
refer collectively to the four largest professional services network firms (PSNF)
globally, consisting of Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, and PwC. This study
learns the following findings: (1) Collaboration process is not static, and
establishing it is continuous and cyclical. Refinement and renegotiation are required
to keep the agreed equilibrium for the existing situation or find a new equilibrium
ii
of the five dimensions of the collaboration process for the new situation. (2) Having
similar objectives, the mutuality dimension of the collaboration process keeps
motivating the four teams to collaborate. The clarity of the mutuality dimension is
essential for parties before starting the collaboration process. (3) The social capital
(mutuality and norms) and autonomy dimensions play a more significant role than
the structural (governance and administration) dimension in establishing the
collaboration process in a professional services network firm (PSNF). (4) It
proposes the practical steps to implement the five dimensions of the collaboration
process. (5) Embedding the theoretical framework in the root definition of SSM
guides to address the dual imperatives of SSM-based AR.
Combining the findings of two parts of the study provides a broader and deeper
understanding and conclusion, answering the bigger research questions: “ how to
build a successful collaboration process practically in PSF. Part-2 of the study’s
findings give the steps to build using five dimensions of the collaboration process
model, and part-1 of the study’s finding clarifies which dimensions must be
properly managed to sustain the collaboration process that has been built. |
---|