DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A FLEXIBLE SPACECRAFT STRUCTURE DUE TO ATTITUDE CONTROL GENERATED MOTION
In the dynamic structural analyses of spacecraft, the structures are typically considered multibody mechanical systems consisting of rigid and flexible parts. The dynamic attitude of the rigid body, i.e., a spacecraft body, induces structural deformation in the flexible parts. The flexible struct...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66870 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | In the dynamic structural analyses of spacecraft, the structures are typically considered
multibody mechanical systems consisting of rigid and flexible parts. The dynamic attitude of
the rigid body, i.e., a spacecraft body, induces structural deformation in the flexible parts. The
flexible structure response, in return, may also affect the control system's performance and
quality in regulating the spacecraft's attitude. The present work investigates a flexible
spacecraft structure's dynamic characteristics and responses due to an attitude control
command's action.
In the present work, two flexible spacecraft models are used: (1) a flexible solar panel
used as a preliminary work, and (2) a set of three flexible solar panels connected by rigid hinges
and yoke. Modal analyses evaluate the models' natural frequencies and mode shapes. In
addition, dynamic response analyses are done in frequency and time domains. The frequency
and time response analyses evaluate the structures' responses exerted by harmonic loads to
verify the modal analyses' results. Furthermore, control torque in the form of one sinusoidal
wave (pulse) is applied as the excitation load.
Control torque concerning the rigid body's pitch motion excites the panel's torsional
modes. In contrast, vertical (heaving) and rotational flapping (rolling) motions exert the
bending modes. Therefore, the flexible responses result in pointing disturbances compared to
the rigid body attitude. The panels are shown to oscillate with the attitude value as the reference
axis. Most cases are depicted to have pointing disturbances up to 5% of the attitude values.
|
---|