COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD
The averaging process is a way to reduce noise in the vibration measurement results of industrial machines. One of the averaging methods is Time Synchronous Averaging (TSA). The TSA method that has been developed by the ITB PAU Dynamics Laboratory is the Advanced Method TSA. Since 2017, the avera...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68200 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:68200 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:682002022-09-09T13:43:38ZCOMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD Ivan Sumartoyo, Fransiskus Indonesia Final Project Advanced Method TSA, MATLAB Method TSA, unbalance INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68200 The averaging process is a way to reduce noise in the vibration measurement results of industrial machines. One of the averaging methods is Time Synchronous Averaging (TSA). The TSA method that has been developed by the ITB PAU Dynamics Laboratory is the Advanced Method TSA. Since 2017, the averaging process using the TSA method can be performed on MATLAB applications using the tsa syntax. This study aims to compare two TSA averaging methods, namely Advanced Method TSA and MATLAB Method TSA. In this study, both methods will be applied to an unbalance case of a two-stage rotor test device. The test will be carried out twice, namely with reference to the upper rotor shaft and the lower rotor shaft. The rotational speed of the motor used is the same for both cases, which is 1600 rpm. After the test is done, the measurement results are averaged using both methods. The resulting TSA signal is then compared with the signal before the TSA. After that, the results of the averaging process are compared to each other. Comparisons were made in both the time domain and the frequency domain. Finally, analysis of transient signal and signal distortion is carried out. The result of comparison with the reference of the upper rotor shaft shows that both methods produced almost the same time domain and frequency domain vibration signals. Meanwhile, the comparison results with the lower rotor shaft reference show that the MATLAB Method TSA produces a slightly better frequency domain vibration signal. This is because the amount of truncated data in the MATLAB Method TSA results is less than the Advanced Method, resulting in slightly better frequency resolution. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
description |
The averaging process is a way to reduce noise in the vibration measurement results
of industrial machines. One of the averaging methods is Time Synchronous Averaging
(TSA). The TSA method that has been developed by the ITB PAU Dynamics Laboratory
is the Advanced Method TSA. Since 2017, the averaging process using the TSA method
can be performed on MATLAB applications using the tsa syntax. This study aims to
compare two TSA averaging methods, namely Advanced Method TSA and MATLAB
Method TSA.
In this study, both methods will be applied to an unbalance case of a two-stage rotor
test device. The test will be carried out twice, namely with reference to the upper rotor shaft
and the lower rotor shaft. The rotational speed of the motor used is the same for both cases,
which is 1600 rpm. After the test is done, the measurement results are averaged using both
methods. The resulting TSA signal is then compared with the signal before the TSA. After
that, the results of the averaging process are compared to each other. Comparisons were
made in both the time domain and the frequency domain. Finally, analysis of transient
signal and signal distortion is carried out.
The result of comparison with the reference of the upper rotor shaft shows that both
methods produced almost the same time domain and frequency domain vibration signals.
Meanwhile, the comparison results with the lower rotor shaft reference show that the
MATLAB Method TSA produces a slightly better frequency domain vibration signal. This
is because the amount of truncated data in the MATLAB Method TSA results is less than
the Advanced Method, resulting in slightly better frequency resolution.
|
format |
Final Project |
author |
Ivan Sumartoyo, Fransiskus |
spellingShingle |
Ivan Sumartoyo, Fransiskus COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
author_facet |
Ivan Sumartoyo, Fransiskus |
author_sort |
Ivan Sumartoyo, Fransiskus |
title |
COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF VIBRATION RESPONSE AVERAGING RESULTS USING ADVANCED METHOD AND MATLAB METHOD |
title_sort |
comparison of vibration response averaging results using advanced method and matlab method |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68200 |
_version_ |
1822278143547801600 |