COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE BUILDING STRUCTURE OF DUAL SYSTEM REINFORCED CONCRETE PRECAST IN JAKARTA WITH AND WITHOUT BASE ISOLATION SYSTEM
The development and application of high performance precast structural systems in reinforced concrete buildings by utilizing the formation of plastic hinges to dissipate energy in the structural components themselves, has been widely produced locally in Indonesia. On the other side, new faults co...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68396 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The development and application of high performance precast structural systems
in reinforced concrete buildings by utilizing the formation of plastic hinges to
dissipate energy in the structural components themselves, has been widely
produced locally in Indonesia. On the other side, new faults continue to be
discovered which will have the potential to continue to increase seismicity, as well
as the need to obtain better structural seismic performance for high-value
buildings. Therefore, the use of a base isolation system is one of the innovations
that can improve the performance of precast building structures. This research will
focus on the use of Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) base isolation, and the building
model is a reinforced concrete dual system which is a combination of the Special
Moment Frames System (SMF) and Special Structural Walls System with 20 floors,
located in a high seismicity area, located at Jakarta who have a high sismicity area
with a soft soil site class and functions as an apartment so that it is included in the
seismic design category D. At the initial stage, the structure is analyzed and
designed with a prescriptive-based approach using linear elastic analysis, where
the detailed design of each structural element will follow SNI 2847:2019 according
to the level of detailing used and the stages of analysis and loading following SNI
1726:2019 for earthquake lateral loading and SNI 1727:2020 for gravity load, both
for the fixed base structure and base isolation system structure. In a more detailed
analysis, performance-based analysis with Non Linear Time History (NLTH) will
be used and the structural responses and performance of the two structural systems
will be compared. Structures with and without base isolation were analyzed by
NLTH using 11 (eleven) pairs of earthquake recordings that had been scaled to
Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE)
from the response spectra of Jakarta soft soil. For non-linear modeling of structural
elements using ASCE 41-17 because it is more conservative. For the structural
model with base isolation, 3 (three) models are carried out, namely with nominal
properties, upper bound properties and lower bound properties to see the effect of
the LRB property modification variant used. The parameters that will be measured
in the NLTH analysis are the dynamic characteristics of the structure, the base shear force, the floor shear force, the total displacement, the displacement ratio
between floors, the roof drift ratio, the damage to the plastic hinges of the structural
elements, the inelastic energy dissipation ratio, and the horizontal deformation of
the base isolation of the LRB. The results of the analysis obtained by NLTH analysis
are for precast building structures without base isolation at the MCE earthquake
level, the performance of the resulting structure is Life Safety (LS), increased to
Immediate Occupancy (IO) after using LRB base isolation, and at the DBE
earthquake level the performance was obtained. structure without base isolation is
Immediate Occupancy (IO), increasing to elastic or operational after the addition
of base isolation LRB. As well as, the other parameters experienced a significant
reduction because the dominant earthquake energy dissipation was centered on the
base isolation element used. So that the combination of the precast structural
system with this base isolation will provide an increase in performance results and
a significant reduction in response, which means that the damage to the upper
structural elements is minimal and can still be repaired after an earthquake occurs,
especially the precast connection system used has the advantage of being able to
easily and effectively repaired again.
|
---|