A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NONLINEAR MODELING OF COUPLING BEAMS AS FRAME ELEMENT AND WALL ELEMENT USING PERFORM-3D
The emergence of performance-based designs emphasizes nonlinear modeling of structural elements in order to describe the inelastic behavior of structures globally and the level of damage to structural elements during the seismic response. For example, in a coupled wall system, the coupling beam i...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68470 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The emergence of performance-based designs emphasizes nonlinear modeling of
structural elements in order to describe the inelastic behavior of structures globally
and the level of damage to structural elements during the seismic response. For
example, in a coupled wall system, the coupling beam is the main dissipator of
seismic forces. So, in assuming the nonlinear modeling of the coupling beam
elements, it is need to be carefully considered and modeled appropriately.
In using the PERFROM-3D nonlinear analysis computer program, several
nonlinear approach models can be used, namely frame elements using nonlinear
plastic hinge models and fiber sections (fiber hinges) then wall elements using
nonlinear fiber-shell elements and fiber-shell models with additional truss, element
to represent the diagonal reinforcement of the coupling beam. The four beam
modeling approaches are used in this study, which gained a better understanding
of the characteristics and behavior of the coupling beam and helped the user to
choose the right model to perform the analysis of the nonlinear coupling beam.
Based on nonlinear pushover analysis and time history analysis, it was found that
the level of performance and structural response including the pushover capacity
curve, roof displacement, base shear, total displacement and story drift of the four
approach models are relatively the same as a whole. but based on the level of
damage to the coupling beam elements there is a significant difference. The
biggest damage occurred in the plastic hinge model, which is 0.48 LS and the
fiber section model is 0.48 LS, then the fiber-shell element model is 0.40 LS and
the smallest damage occurred in the fiber-shell + truss element, which is 0.1 LS.
Based on the performance level, the frame element model provides a conservative
performance and can be concluded as the best and most accurate model. |
---|