#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
Abstract: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Masonry infill panel is tending to has interaction with its frame especially to earthquake loading. This condition is different with what we always think about it. Until now, we think that masonry infill pa...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/6853 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:6853 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:68532017-09-27T15:23:30Z#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# Pahlawan (NIM 250 04 058), Trio Indonesia Theses INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/6853 Abstract: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Masonry infill panel is tending to has interaction with its frame especially to earthquake loading. This condition is different with what we always think about it. Until now, we think that masonry infill panel in a building structure is a non-structural element. Interaction with its frame is caused by several factors. They are difficulty in mathematical modeling of masonry infill panel material and different result of research from different type of its material or from different regions. It is a nonlinear and difficult collapse behavior of masonry infill panel frame. This collapse behavior is depended to the connection of frame elements with masonry infill panel. Elastic analysis method is not the right method to analysis this behavior. We use equivalent diagonal strut method to predict the strength and stiffness to frame-masonry infill panel by using masonry infill panel ratio aspects and the non close meeting of masonry infill panel which is caused by shrinkage. To analyze masonry infill panel with equivalent diagonal strut method, we use dimension, specimen material data and hysteretic model (we use smooth hysteretic which is can shown stiffness degradation, strength deteriorotation and specimen pinching phenomena). IDARC2D recommend some parameters that can be make this hysteretic pattern. The result of analysis concluded that default parameter give different result from experiment and the different of material give a big influence to the result. On the other time, the different of frame type give influence to restraint value which is given by frame to masonry infill panel. The result of calibration model or of manual model by using IDARC2D for describe energy dissipation per cycle or energy dissipation cumulative have more close result to experiment than the result of RECAP (FEM) <br /> text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
description |
Abstract: <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Masonry infill panel is tending to has interaction with its frame especially to earthquake loading. This condition is different with what we always think about it. Until now, we think that masonry infill panel in a building structure is a non-structural element. Interaction with its frame is caused by several factors. They are difficulty in mathematical modeling of masonry infill panel material and different result of research from different type of its material or from different regions. It is a nonlinear and difficult collapse behavior of masonry infill panel frame. This collapse behavior is depended to the connection of frame elements with masonry infill panel. Elastic analysis method is not the right method to analysis this behavior. We use equivalent diagonal strut method to predict the strength and stiffness to frame-masonry infill panel by using masonry infill panel ratio aspects and the non close meeting of masonry infill panel which is caused by shrinkage. To analyze masonry infill panel with equivalent diagonal strut method, we use dimension, specimen material data and hysteretic model (we use smooth hysteretic which is can shown stiffness degradation, strength deteriorotation and specimen pinching phenomena). IDARC2D recommend some parameters that can be make this hysteretic pattern. The result of analysis concluded that default parameter give different result from experiment and the different of material give a big influence to the result. On the other time, the different of frame type give influence to restraint value which is given by frame to masonry infill panel. The result of calibration model or of manual model by using IDARC2D for describe energy dissipation per cycle or energy dissipation cumulative have more close result to experiment than the result of RECAP (FEM) <br />
|
format |
Theses |
author |
Pahlawan (NIM 250 04 058), Trio |
spellingShingle |
Pahlawan (NIM 250 04 058), Trio #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
author_facet |
Pahlawan (NIM 250 04 058), Trio |
author_sort |
Pahlawan (NIM 250 04 058), Trio |
title |
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
title_short |
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
title_full |
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
title_fullStr |
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
title_full_unstemmed |
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# |
title_sort |
#title_alternative# |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/6853 |
_version_ |
1820663990707027968 |