#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#

• Main Author: Hutagalung, Tulus
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/6855
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

<b>Abstract</b>: <p align="justify"><br />This research is a policy analysis using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) through method of forward-bacward process. The purpose of this research is to determine policy needed to be implemented in Container Terminal of Tanjung Priok, which supports the flow of containers steadily.<br />Except it is determined by the capacity of terminal's facility, the flow of containers is influenced by actors involved in traffic process of containers. So, the analysis is carried out which involved those actors, objectives of actors, exploratory scenario of the future of the system, anticipatory scenario of the desired future of the system, problems which would occur, and alternative of policy which should be decided. So, for analyzing it there are two types of structures of hierarchy : hierarchy of forward process and hierarchy of backward process.<br />Analysis of the first forward process involved eight actors along with their objectives. Those actors are : Container Terminal, Port Administration Office, Customs, Shipping Lines, Forwarders, Loading-t Inloading Companies, Land Transportations, and Banks. There are four scenari 3s of the future of the system : scenario of status quo, scenario of keeping the existing system with adding on capacity of terminal's facility, scenario of implementing of EDI-system, and scenario of replacing Container Terminal to other place.<br />Analysis of the first forward process produced results of five actors acting significantly : Container Terminal, Customs, Shipping Lines, Forwarders, and Loading-Unloading Companies. This analysis also issued the most probably scenario of the projected future of the system : scenario of implementing of EDI-system with priority value of 0.444.<br />Analysis of the first backward process issued the most desired scenario of the future of the system which is same as scenario of the projected future of the system comes from previous process : scenario of implementing of EDT-system. This analysis also produced alternative of policy : implementing incentive for using of EDT-system.<br />The alternative of policy produced from the backward process as mentioned before, would be become an objective of actor of Container Terminal, and then analysis of the second forward process is carried out. This second forward process analysis had result of the most probably scenario of the projected future of the system : scenario of implementing of EDI-system with priority value of 0.446. So, there is enhancement of scenario of projected future of the system in this second forward process.<br />From the analysis which has been done, it may conclude that scenario of implementing of EDI-system is the most probably scenario of projected future of the system, and alternative of policy of implementing of incentive for using of EDI-system should be implemented in Container Terminal of Tanjung Priok.