THE INFLUENCE OF HEAT TREATMENTS ON MICROSTRUCTURE AND HARDNESS OF MANGANESE STEEL ASTM A128 GRADE C
The rapid development of heavy industry has caused serious problems which are most related to mechanical failure as abrasive wear mode. Hence, the need for materials with high toughness and work-hardening capacity becomes more important. Austenitic manganese steel or Hadfield steel is widely used...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/68869 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The rapid development of heavy industry has caused serious problems which are
most related to mechanical failure as abrasive wear mode. Hence, the need for materials
with high toughness and work-hardening capacity becomes more important. Austenitic
manganese steel or Hadfield steel is widely used because of its high impact toughness and
work-hardening capacity but the use of this steel has a problem, since the intergranular
carbide can bring the brittleness problem caused by the solidification process. The onestep
and two-step heat treatment processes along with rapid quenching are applied to solve
this problem. This research aims to learn the differences between heat treatment results in
microstructure and its hardness.
This research used 1000? for two hours, a two-step heat treatment with 595? (ten
hours of holding) followed by 980? (two hours of holding), also another two-step heat
treatment with 700? (three hours of holding) and followed by 1000? (one-half hours of
holding). All three methods are followed by rapid quenching. Hardness test and
microstructure observation then need to be done to see any differences.
All three methods succeeded to dissolve intergranular carbide. Also, the two-step
process succeeded to create dispersion-hardened austenite and proved to have higher
hardness than single-phase austenite. The heat treatment with 700? (three hours of
holding) followed by 1000? (one-half hours of holding) results in the lowest hardness
compared to other methods. Fine carbide with higher size results in lower hardness.
|
---|