DEVELOPMENT OF WEB-BASED SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE LABELING TOOLS
Computer vision has been further researched to assist human workers in various fields. The current computer vision approach uses machine learning, so the development of computer vision can take advantage of labeled image data. For the model built to process the image properly, a lot of labeled da...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/69188 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Computer vision has been further researched to assist human workers in various
fields. The current computer vision approach uses machine learning, so the
development of computer vision can take advantage of labeled image data. For the
model built to process the image properly, a lot of labeled data is needed. Therefore,
developing a computer vision model that utilizes machine learning has a long
process of collecting and labeling image data.
Many tools have been created to assist the process of labeling image data that have
a graphical interface to make it easier for users to label images. In this final project,
further development of the image data labeling tool is carried out to make the image
data labeling process more straightforward. By utilizing a machine learning model
in computer vision that has given good results in the detection of image data, the
labeling tool is further modified by providing a label recommendation system when
the labeling process is carried out. The recommendation system built makes the
semi-automatic image data labeling process because the user does not need to
provide a label from zero so that the efficiency of data labeling has the potential to
increase. Kakas is built on a web-based basis, so the data integration process
between labelers becomes more accessible and faster. The built-in tool can
potentially increase the efficiency of labeling image data by 62.79% compared to
the manual labeling processes. |
---|