THE UPPER CIBULAKAN SANDSTONE RESERVOIR FACIES ANALYSIS AND CHARACTERIZATION, LARAS FIELD, NORT WEST JAWA BASIN
Laras Field has located in the North West Java Basin. Administratively, this field is part of the Subang Regency. The Field was discovered in 1969 by L-1 exploration well. Hydrocarbon production from the Laras Field began in 1971 with peak production in 1974, reaching 56,000 BOPD from the Upper C...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/69436 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Laras Field has located in the North West Java Basin. Administratively, this field
is part of the Subang Regency. The Field was discovered in 1969 by L-1 exploration
well. Hydrocarbon production from the Laras Field began in 1971 with peak
production in 1974, reaching 56,000 BOPD from the Upper Cibulakan Formation.
This reservoir deposited in a shallow marine environment above the Baturaja
Formation. The sandstone reservoir of the Upper Cibulakan Formation in Laras
Field consists of several intervals, namely LRS-22, LRS-23, LRS-26, LRS-27, LRS-
29, LRS-33, LRS-34, LRS-35, and LRS-36 with a depth range from 2.200 ft to 3.600
ft. The reservoir layers of LRS-22, LRS-27B, and LRS-29C are the largest
hydrocarbon producers in the Laras Field and describe as shallow-marine
sandstone reservoirs with a wide reservoir distribution and homogeneous reservoir
characters. Both reservoirs have entered the mature category with waterflood
programs from 2001 and 2010 in the West Block.
The Waterflood program's main problem is that the results of development well
drilling are not optimal after the injection process began. The results of drilling
development wells indicate that LRS-22, LRS-27B, and LRS-29 have high
heterogeneity. Reservoir heterogeneity found in the Laras Field includes changes
in facies and rock property characters vertically and laterally. This condition shows
previous prediction inaccuracy that the Upper Cibulakan Formation has an
extensive geometry and homogeneous rock properties. This research aims to define
the Upper Cibulakan Formation sandstone characteristics and reservoir genetic
communication, both lateral and vertical, based on integrating 900 ft conventional
core data, 74 RCA data, 152 well logs, and three-dimensional seismic data. The
sequence stratigraphy method will divide the Upper Cibulakan Formation
sandstones in a geological time frame or bounded by chronostratigraphic markers.
This method will provide a detailed description of the Upper Cibulakan Formation
sandstone reservoirs facies characteristics and each reservoirs facies geometry.
Conventional cores analysis shows seven lithofacies in the Upper Cibulakan
Formation, namely: claystone-siltstone, lenticular siltstone, flaser sandstones,
cross-bedded sandstones, non-calcareous sandstones, laminated – cross
lamination sandstone, and calcareous sandstones. The lithofacies arrangement of the Upper Cibulakan Formation in Laras Field is divided into two. The first
lithofacies are constituents of tidal shelf ridges that form in shallow marine
environments. The second lithofacies is beach barrier deposits from the backshoreforeshore
environment. The lithofacies of tidal shelf ridges are siltstone-siltstones,
calcareous sandstones, lenticular siltstones, flaser sandstones, cross-bedded
sandstones, and non-calcareous sandstones. Laras Field tidal shelf ridges reservoir
consists of lenticular siltstone, flaser sandstone, cross-bedded sandstones, and
massive sandstones. The lithofacies that forming beach barrier deposits are crosslaminated
sandstones and laminated sandstones. This beach barrier deposit only
present in the depositional interval of the LRS-22C reservoir.
The tidal shelf ridges lithofacies divided into four association facies that reflect the
tidal shelf ridge development stages. The four association facies form a cyclic or
repetitive pattern bounded by chronostratigraphic markers of marine flooding
surfaces. Siltstone-claystone and calcareous sandstones are part of the embryonic
phase. Calcareous sandstones from the embryonic stage characterized by an
abundance of shell fragments and siltstone-claystone clasts from previously
deposited rocks. These sandstones indicate the presence of transgressive surface
chronostratigraphic markers. Lenticulars siltstone and flaser sandstones are part
of the immature accretion phase, while the mature accretion phase consists of
cross-bedded sandstones and non-calcareous sandstones. Calcareous sandstones
and claystone are a member of an abandonment phase. These calcareous
sandstones show the presence of intensive bioturbation and high cementation.
The presence of four associated facies in the deposition of tidal shelf ridges reflects
the vertical heterogeneity of facies that compose the reservoirs in the Upper
Cibulakan Formation. The geometry of the tidal shelf ridges sandstone reservoir in
Laras Field shows sandstone ridges morphology with a northeast-southwest trend.
The ridge morphology will control the lateral distribution of associated facies,
especially the mature accretion stage. Mature accretion facies generally formed at
the thickest part of the tidal shelf ridges due to the influence of waves current during
deposition. Immature accretion facies are formed due to tidal currents effect and
have a wider distribution.
The facies reconstruction analysis using a high-resolution sequence stratigraphic
method shows that the sandstones of the Upper Cibulakan Formation are part of
the transgressive deposits of the ancient coastline, which are dominated by tidal
currents mixed with wave currents. The facies reconstruction analysis using a highresolution
sequence stratigraphic method shows that the sandstones of the Upper
Cibulakan Formation are part of the transgressive deposits of the ancient coastline,
which are dominated by tidal currents mixed with wave currents and storms. Using
this method, the analysis result can increase the confidence level in the
heterogeneity model of the Upper Cibulakan Formation reservoir in Laras Field.
This analysis provides a more accurate description of the Laras field's development
and provides benefits during production. |
---|