LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF WATER AND CEMENT (W/C) RATIOS AND ADDITION OF NANOSILICA AND SILICA FUME ON THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF MORTAR
A building strong foundation is influenced by the quality of the concrete. However, concrete have so many variables that have to be investigated. In addition, many high strength concrete researchers from ITB bachelor of materials engineering have failed to produce concrete samples qualified as hi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/70534 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | A building strong foundation is influenced by the quality of the concrete.
However, concrete have so many variables that have to be investigated. In
addition, many high strength concrete researchers from ITB bachelor of materials
engineering have failed to produce concrete samples qualified as high-strength
concrete. Therefore, the mortar samples was first investigated to assess the
potential of strength improvement by adding mineral admixture, namely
nanosilica and silica fume. Through literature review from several journals
discussed the compressive strength of mortars with the addition of its two mineral
admixtures, a correlation between journals is made through graphic images. In
this study, data obtained that the water and cement (w/c) ratio of 0,25 in mortar
sample without mineral admixture provided the highest compressive strength.
Then, the addition of 3, 5, and 10% nanosilica and silica fume respectively to the
mortars provided higher compressive strength than mortars without the two
mineral admixtures at 28 days of mortars age. Between nanosilica and silica
fume, mortar with nanosilica provided a higher compressive strength
improvement than silica fume in all percent of mineral admixture addition. This
was happened because of the higher silica content of nanosilica, and also smaller
and denser nanosilica grain. In addition, from XRD analysis and SEM
morphology, it can be seen that the porosity of mortar samples with nanosilica
addition was less than mortar samples with silica fume addition. |
---|