3D SEISMIC INTEGRATION ON GEOSTATISTIC MODELING OF RESERVOIR PROPERTIES AT KOTABATAK FIELD
High resolution 3D seismic data was aquired in Kotabatak Field in 2003, but until recently was not fully utilized for reservoir characterization. Integration of inverted 3D data with the geostatistic earth model using collocated cokriging has resulted in a much more effective and comprehensive 3D...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/70693 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | High resolution 3D seismic data was aquired in Kotabatak Field in 2003, but until
recently was not fully utilized for reservoir characterization. Integration of
inverted 3D data with the geostatistic earth model using collocated cokriging has
resulted in a much more effective and comprehensive 3D geologic model.
Correlations between reservoir properties and the 3D inversion data were
achieved by cross plotting properties. Synthetic seismic inversion, as a product of
well log data resulted in an increase in vertical resolution in the data and the
ability to resolve top and base of the target reservoir unit, the Bekasap A sand.
The resulting stratigraphic grid (SGRID) provided a better resolved
characterization while honoring the seismic data.
Early seismic integration in the geologic models relyed heavily on Vp/Vs trends
for the simulation of lithofacies binary indicator parameters.This technique was
very rarely used on previous research on the binnary indicator simulation. This
technique was conducted by consistently applied the proportion of parameter
indicator on the soft data to the simulation of lithofacies indicator parameter.
Variograms of reservoir properties were then designed following lithofacies
parameter trends
Recent modeling, using collated cokriging, has been focused on using different
soft data for each reservoir property, guided by correlation coefficients from cross
plots. Porosity was simulated using LamdaRho as soft data while saturations
where guided by Poisson’s Ratio as soft data. Correlation coefficients were at
times discounted prior to simulation relative to differences between cross plot and
simulation soft data results.
This technique has provided an optimum results with acceptable error ranges.
The model was validated with 21 wells to optimize the confidence level and the
result is 81% correlation with validation wells with a 14% error range for porosity
and 12% range for saturations. The utilization of high resolution 3D seismic data
vii
combined with cokriging techniques have dramatically improved the 3D geologic
model, providing for more realistic and statistically successful subsurface
interpretations. |
---|