MACHINE LEARNING-GUIDED STUDY OF FLUOROSCENCE CARBON DOTS WITH OPTICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION
Carbon dots (CDs) are a type of carbon nanoparticles that have been extensively studied for their unique properties, such as adjustable fluorescence, stability and biocompatibility. However, obtaining CDs with a certain fluorescence can be challenging due to many factors affecting their synthesis...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/71822 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Carbon dots (CDs) are a type of carbon nanoparticles that have been extensively
studied for their unique properties, such as adjustable fluorescence, stability and
biocompatibility. However, obtaining CDs with a certain fluorescence can be
challenging due to many factors affecting their synthesis, such as precursor
concentration, reaction time, pH and type of solvent. To vary the synthesis factors,
repeated experiments with errors are required which require a lot of money. To
predict the peak wavelength of fluorescence on CDs, one of the methods that can
be used is machine learning. Machine learning (ML) is a technique that allows
computers to learn without being given explicit instructions. In this study, ML is
used to predict the peak wavelength of CDs fluorescence emissions. CDs were
synthesized using ethylenediamine (EDA) and phosphoric acid (PA) precursors
with the help of microwave radiation. Synthesis parameters such as precursor
volume and irradiation time are varied, along with the peak wavelength of the
fluorescence emission (excitation 365 nm) used to build a dataset that is used as
input to ML algorithms. The algorithms used are algorithms such as decision tree,
random forest, and XGBoost. The algorithm is tested using R2
and RMSE values.
Based on the results of the synthesis of CDs, it shows blue fluorescence when
irradiated with UV light with different intensities and wavelengths between
samples. The results of the optimized XGBoost Model show that R2
is around 0.94
in the test data and 0.99 in the training data.
|
---|