RELATIONSHIP MODEL OF LEADERSHIP MATURITY AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE: CONSTRUCTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIAâS GOVERNMENT PROJECTS
The construction industry has a high level of safety risk, and Indonesia is no exception. Safety leadership is the main factor in shaping construction safety performance which is manifested through zero accident conditions. In the context of Indonesian government construction projects, the leader...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dissertations |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/72200 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | The construction industry has a high level of safety risk, and Indonesia is no
exception. Safety leadership is the main factor in shaping construction safety
performance which is manifested through zero accident conditions. In the context
of Indonesian government construction projects, the leader with the greatest level
of influence is the project owner represented by the Commitment Making Officer
(PPK). Therefore, this study aims to develop a model of the relationship between
safety leadership maturity of project owners and construction project safety
performance.
The construction safety leadership maturity model is determined by 5 independent
variables which already been validated by experts, namely: 1) property maturity
and leader character; 2) psychosocial maturity; 3) participatory maturity; 4)
maturity of public communication; and 5) safety competency maturity. These five
variables form the project's safety performance as the dependent variable.
Data collection through a survey was conducted on 323 respondents from
government construction projects (particularly the Ministry of Public Works and
Housing and the Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia). The
results with the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis through AMOS
software show that PPK leadership maturity is still low. The highest maturity
variable is the participatory aspect and the lowest is the leader's property dan
character aspect. The PPK's contribution which describes its maturity is divided
into three stages, namely before the project is implemented, during the project
implementation, and when the project accident occurs. The main contribution
before the implementation of the project was in the PPK's efforts to ensure the
selection of contractors who have a good construction work safety management
system standard. At the project implementation stage, PPK supervision becomes
the main thing. Contributions to these two stages are expected to result in zero
accidents on the project, and finally the PPK must still ensure the speed of handling
if an accident occurs on the project Through the results of leadership maturity calculations, PPKs tend to have a
transactional leadership style that is weaker than a transformational leadership
style. Ownership of the two leadership styles above is referred to as full range
leadership. To assess the PPK maturity in particular, there are two methods
through the instruments based on dominant indicators of leadership maturity
model. The first method is an assessment by the Kuasa Pengguna Anggaran (KPA)
and the second is a self-assessment by PPK itself.
This research requires PPK to have leadership maturity to carry out substantive
tasks related to safety, not only administrative. This is a recommendation to
complement the laws and regulations governing the duties and responsibilities of
PPK. Furthermore, the role of the project owner who has focused on the substance
of safety also needs to be complemented by administrative tasks to ensure safe and
orderly project implementation. |
|---|