ANALYSIS OF OPEN COAL MINING POTENTIAL AREAS BASED ON SATELLITE IMAGE DATA AND MACHINE LEARNING
<p align="justify">This research aims to explore the potential use of machine learning in coal exploration in Indonesia using satellite image and drillhole data. Coal is one of the largest energy sources in Indonesia and has significant deposit reserves. However, open-pit mining p...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/73435 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | <p align="justify">This research aims to explore the potential use of machine learning in coal exploration
in Indonesia using satellite image and drillhole data. Coal is one of the largest energy
sources in Indonesia and has significant deposit reserves. However, open-pit mining
prospects become increasingly difficult in the future due to coal layers being located
deeper than the surface, resulting in a higher ratio of coal to rock and reaching
uneconomical values. Therefore, determining areas with coal potential requires
interdisciplinary exploration methods to identify coal deposit potential. This study
used drillhole data as training points and testing for machine learning model
development to classify potential coal mines. Random Forest and CART machine
learning models were used with 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, and 90:10 data training and
testing splits. The goal of using machine learning models is to optimize coal potential
analysis in a location. The research results are expected to provide useful information
for efficient coal exploration in the future. The research results show that the study
area has a coal volume of 293524743 m3. In addition, the best classification accuracy
was obtained by Random Forest 80:20 and CART 90:10, while Cart 80:20 was the
only one that could identify true positives in validation data with the largest variable
importance in band-4 at 0.543 and accuracy of 0.777778, precision of 1, recall of
0.333333, and f-1 score of 0.5. The correlation between data was not significant.
|
---|